2013
DOI: 10.1353/sce.2013.0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Childhood without Life, Life without Childhood: Theological and Legal Critiques of Current Juvenile Justice Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, with respect to past mental health interventions the participants experienced, they shared that the few programs they had been offered tended to be vertical and adult-centric, thereby confirming the findings of the reviewed literature, which discussed the dominant prevalence of the adult- and risk-centered paradigms of adolescence ( 17 – 19 , 47 ). The participants stated that the interventions they had previously seen did not comply with the criteria they considered essential for the acceptability and relevance of an intervention model ( 48 , 49 ), and they also viewed traditional mental health services as distant, stigmatizing, and ineffective, reflective of the documented treatment gap between adolescents and clinical services ( 7 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Secondly, with respect to past mental health interventions the participants experienced, they shared that the few programs they had been offered tended to be vertical and adult-centric, thereby confirming the findings of the reviewed literature, which discussed the dominant prevalence of the adult- and risk-centered paradigms of adolescence ( 17 – 19 , 47 ). The participants stated that the interventions they had previously seen did not comply with the criteria they considered essential for the acceptability and relevance of an intervention model ( 48 , 49 ), and they also viewed traditional mental health services as distant, stigmatizing, and ineffective, reflective of the documented treatment gap between adolescents and clinical services ( 7 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%