2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's additive concepts: Promoting understanding and the role of inhibition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
23
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…CF was related to neither; however, it is possible that CF may be engaged only for items that require shifting between and engaging both conceptual and procedural skill, but not for understanding the conceptual and procedural aspects of math themselves. These relations of IC to conceptual math knowledge and WM to procedural math knowledge are supported by the prior literature (Cragg & Gilmore, ; LeFevre et al, ; McLean & Hitch, ), but have been reported largely for older children (Hecht, Close, & Santisi, ; Robinson & Dubé, ). By limiting the present investigation to early childhood—a period during which children are rapidly developing an understanding of conceptual and procedural skills that underlie much of their later mathematical understanding—we are able to extend findings from prior investigations to suggest that different facets of EF might support the learning of different skills—or be engaged in the solving of different problem types—even within the same academic domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…CF was related to neither; however, it is possible that CF may be engaged only for items that require shifting between and engaging both conceptual and procedural skill, but not for understanding the conceptual and procedural aspects of math themselves. These relations of IC to conceptual math knowledge and WM to procedural math knowledge are supported by the prior literature (Cragg & Gilmore, ; LeFevre et al, ; McLean & Hitch, ), but have been reported largely for older children (Hecht, Close, & Santisi, ; Robinson & Dubé, ). By limiting the present investigation to early childhood—a period during which children are rapidly developing an understanding of conceptual and procedural skills that underlie much of their later mathematical understanding—we are able to extend findings from prior investigations to suggest that different facets of EF might support the learning of different skills—or be engaged in the solving of different problem types—even within the same academic domain.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Compensating for weaknesses in one area through the use of alternative strategies is likely to require good attentional control, in order to inhibit prepotent strategies (e.g. Robinson & Dubé, 2013). This adds to the evidence of moderation effects, further demonstrating that the relationships between basic numerical skills and overall achievement are not independent of domain-general resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Interestingly, although inhibition and shifting previously have been shown to be impaired in children with RD (Booth et al, ), for both groups, greater inhibition test results were still associated with greater fluency abilities. This suggests that suppressing distracting information or unwanted answers is crucial for stronger and accurate fluency in general, and all the more so for reading and arithmetic fluency (Horowitz‐Kraus, , b; Robinson & Dubé, ). These findings may suggest that mathematical cognition is not unitary, but relies on different EF subcomponents and consists of multiple components (Cowan et al, ; Dowker, ; Jordan & Wylie, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%