2020
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4274654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's and young people's digital skills: a systematic evidence review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
5

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also necessary to highlight the level of autonomy minors declare when signing up for social networks, an action to which theoretically the vast majority of respondents should not have had access since the legally required age to open an account is 13 to 14 (age varies among platforms and requires parental consent.) Finally, as in previous studies (Mascheroni et al, 2020;Haddon et al, 2020;Trucco, Palma, 2020), age was a determining variable. In general, minors ages 13 and 14 reported having learned on their own to a greater extent than 10-to 12-year-olds, who stated they turned to their parents to perform the proposed actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also necessary to highlight the level of autonomy minors declare when signing up for social networks, an action to which theoretically the vast majority of respondents should not have had access since the legally required age to open an account is 13 to 14 (age varies among platforms and requires parental consent.) Finally, as in previous studies (Mascheroni et al, 2020;Haddon et al, 2020;Trucco, Palma, 2020), age was a determining variable. In general, minors ages 13 and 14 reported having learned on their own to a greater extent than 10-to 12-year-olds, who stated they turned to their parents to perform the proposed actions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Besides this, the current lack of common definitions and understanding among the scientific community of concepts such as digital skills, digital competence and digital literacy increases the difficulty for the design of global and systematic strategies that can help in the development of these concepts among minors (Donoso et al, 2021;Haddon et al, 2020). Evidence shows that the level of digital skills of minors is positively associated with the frequency and variety of activities (Livingstone et al, 2019) in which minors get involved online .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the data, Chilean homes could be an ideal place for the development of children's digital skills given the wide variety of mobile digital devices that can be made available. Both the variety of technologies available for minors at home and the chance to access the network autonomously is related to the acquisition of digital skills (Haddon et al, 2020). Particularly noteworthy is the high penetration of smartphones, which has increased 7 percentage points compared to that reported in previous studies (Cabello et al, 2017) and now practically reaches 100 %, and is the most widely owned device among minors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The acquisition of digital skills which lead to digital competence is an essential precondition for minors' development and general well-being (Livingstone et al, 2018;Smahel et al, 2020). Among the antecedents that can facilitate or hinder its acquisition, individual characteristics of minors such as sociodemographic factors (age and gender), social characteristics (socioeconomic status and parental mediation), characteristics of the country where they live and others related to their own use of the internet, access, as well as their perception of effectiveness in the use of the internet, and preference for online social interactions (Cabello et al, 2020;Haddon et al, 2020;Garmendia et al, 2019;Livingstone, Helsper, 2010;Mascheroni et al, 2020;Trucco, Palma, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that both the practices of digital engagement and the related competencies of children and young people are, and have always been, far from uniform (Bennett & Maton, 2010; Haddon et al, 2020; Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). The literature on digital natives has long since shown (e.g., Bennett & Maton, 2010) that such homogeneous generations (individuals with identical ways of engaging in the digital world) do not exist (Evans & Robertson, 2020) and that, despite strong claims, there seems to be no evidence linking digital media to the demise of young people (Odgers & Jensen, 2020).…”
Section: Multidimensional Digital Engagement Among Young Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%