Children's conceptions of Jesus

Abstract

This paper presents findings from a recent study investigating young children's (aged 10-11) conceptions of Jesus in England. The overall picture revealed by the study is that whilst there was a general assent amongst pupils in our sample towards an ethical and humanistic conception of the historical Jesus, there was less of a consensus about those issues which previous research claims children find difficult to understand, namely: the divinity of Jesus; the miracles of Jesus; and Christian beliefs pertaining to Jesus' continued presence in people's lives today. The paper concludes by arguing that the variety of conceptions of Jesus which are encountered in RE may be seen by children as a barrier to learning rather than an opportunity to grow in understanding and highlights the need for further research into the relationship between children's hermeneutical horizons and RE curriculum content. Children's conceptions of Jesus AbstractThis paper presents findings from a recent study investigating young children's (aged 10-11) conceptions of Jesus in England. The overall picture revealed by the study is that whilst there was a general assent amongst pupils in our sample towards an ethical and humanistic conception of the historical Jesus, there was less of a consensus about those issues which previous research claims children find difficult to understand, namely: the divinity of Jesus; the miracles of Jesus; and Christian beliefs pertaining to Jesus' continued presence in people's lives today. The paper concludes by arguing that the variety of conceptions of Jesus which are encountered in RE may be seen by children as a barrier to learning rather than an opportunity to grow in understanding and highlights the need for further research into the relationship between children's hermeneutical horizons and RE curriculum content.

Creating metacognitive environments in primary school RE classrooms

“…The emphasis on self-knowledge evident in much theoretical literature and policy documents, for example, Erricker and Erricker (2000), Aylward and Freathy (2008), QCA (2004) and…”

Beyond the Bullet Points: Teaching the Bible in Norwegian Upper Secondary Religious Education

“…The pupils' interpretations show a great degree of autonomy, both with regard to the parable and the Christian interpretation. Vestøl (2014) Other studies examine issues that are relevant to the teaching of the Bible in REnamely, the attitudes of the pupils toward the Bible (Freathy 2006); pupils' knowledge and understanding of the Bible (Worsley 2004) and Jesus (Walshe 2005;Aylward and Freathy 2008;Freathy and Aylward 2010); how pupils respond to Jesus (Copley and Walshe 2002), passages from the Bible (Copley 1998;Copley et al 2001), and the New Testament (Loman and Francis 2006); and the relevance of the Bible to the pupils (Ker€ anen-Pantsu and Ubani 2018).…”

Theology in multi-faith Religious Education: a taboo to be broken?

“…The connections made here between personal theistic beliefs, 'thinking theologically', and accessing 'crucial inner meanings' within the material under study (p. 28, Section 5.34), may imply that those who do not 'bring a personal commitment to the religion being studied' cannot do theology for themselves, and that there is a hierarchy of 'knowing', 'understanding' and 'believing', where 'true' understanding can only be accomplished fully by the 'believer'. Following earlier work by Aylward and Freathy (2008) and Freathy and Aylward (2010), the link between belief and understanding has more recently been explored by Walshe and Teece (2013) in relation to 'religious understanding'. They note, '[f]or some, religious understanding presupposes religious belief as to understand a religious concept is to accommodate it into one's conception of reality' (p. 3).…”