1985
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9120/20/4/306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's conceptual understanding of forces and equilibrium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
12

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
20
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study of secondary students' understanding of static equilibrium, Terry, Jones, and Hurford (1985) observed that students often represented gravity as a force pushing down on an object; drawings were often accompanied by explanations that mirrored other studies' results of air being required for gravity. Smith and Treagust (1988), like previous researchers, found that students believed gravity to be associated with rotation; they also found that students believed a planet's distance from the Sun affects the strength of its gravitational attraction on an object to the planet.…”
Section: Gravitational Forcesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a study of secondary students' understanding of static equilibrium, Terry, Jones, and Hurford (1985) observed that students often represented gravity as a force pushing down on an object; drawings were often accompanied by explanations that mirrored other studies' results of air being required for gravity. Smith and Treagust (1988), like previous researchers, found that students believed gravity to be associated with rotation; they also found that students believed a planet's distance from the Sun affects the strength of its gravitational attraction on an object to the planet.…”
Section: Gravitational Forcesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the static group, the cases with bodies in contact include: a book on the tabletop (Terry et al, 1985;Hestenes, Wells, & Swackhamer, 1992;Trumper, 1996;Palmer, 2001;Bryce & MacMillan, 2005), a man trying to push a box (Brown, 1989;Thijs & Bosch, 1995), a stone resting on another (Palmer, 2001), an object connected to a spring which is placed on a frictionless plane (Park & Han, 2002). On the other hand, the dynamic group focuses on students' understanding about the cases in which bodies are moving.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the point of view that action always overcomes reaction is a common reason for the failure of accepting the principle that the third-law force pair has the same magnitude (Grimellini-Tomasini, Pecori-Balandi, Pacca, & Villani, 1993). Finding in some other studies reveals that students have problem in comprehending that objects have the same magnitude of force as the opponent in the following situation: inanimate bodies (Finegold & Gorksy, 1988;Hestenes, Wells, & Swackhamer, 1992), stationary bodies (Terry et al, 1985;Tao & Gunstone 1999a), distant bodies (Kolokotronis & Solomonidou, 2003), and so on.…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Entretanto, que seja do nosso conhecimento, os numerosos e diversos trabalhos de investigação que relatam as idéias dos estudantes em Mecânica (entre outros, Viennot 1979, 1989, 1996, Saltiel & Malgrange 1980, Maloney 1984, Ogborn 1985, Terry & Saltiel 1985, Menigaux 1986Whitelock 1991;Boyle & Maloney 1991, Thornton & Sokoloff 1998, de modo geral não se ocupam especificamente sobre o tema do fenômeno do atrito sólido seco, existindo, portanto, uma ausência de trabalhos que se dediquem à investigação do impacto que o estudo dos vários aspectos desse fenômeno pode trazer para os estudantes.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified