2018
DOI: 10.1017/s1352465818000115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Naive Concepts of OCD and How They Are Affected by Biomedical Versus Cognitive Behavioural Psychoeducation

Abstract: Psychoeducation for childhood OCD is impactful. Despite its wide use by clinicians and mental health services, biomedical psychoeducation appears to have deleterious effects. Children's concepts of OCD merit attention but caution should be applied in how they are targeted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(51 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, if the information provided is conflicting, children and parents may well be left with incoherent integration of the information provided and feel confused as to how to understand themselves or their children. Subsequently, this could affect expectations of coping, recovery and future development [13,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, if the information provided is conflicting, children and parents may well be left with incoherent integration of the information provided and feel confused as to how to understand themselves or their children. Subsequently, this could affect expectations of coping, recovery and future development [13,[40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively viable natural candidate is psychoeducation. Psychological education in primary interventions is expected to raise people’s awareness of pediatric OCD and help parents identify their children’s risk traits early [ 11 , 19 , 97 ]. However, these strategies have not been fully evaluated, and we have no idea whether psychoeducation is likely to be effective in protecting against pediatric OCD.…”
Section: Primary Secondary and Tertiary Prevention Of Pediatric Ocdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, for healthy individuals without OCD symptoms, but a positive family history of the condition (and/or Tics; Stage 0), we recommend watchful observation by the parents and/or the subject themselves and psychoeducation. Although these strategies have not yet been comprehensively evaluated, there is some evidence that, even at the minimal doses, psychoeducation modifies the individual's conceptualisations of OCD, and therefore the outcomes [79]. In contrast, approaches for individuals with subthreshold OCD (Stage I) have included a 3-hour cognitive behavioural workshop, which in one clinical trial reduced number of OCD symptoms at 5-month follow-up, and the extent of thought action fusion (TAF) at 1 and 5-month follow-up [80].…”
Section: A Stepped Care Approach According To Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%