2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60226-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Perceived Benefits and Barriers in Relation to Eating Breakfast in Schools With or Without Universal School Breakfast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
85
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reddan et al (32) reported that students believed eating breakfast may help to increase energy and to enhance attention in school. So, in order to increase the effect of nutrition education interventions, an emphasis on increasing the knowledge of students and their parents about positive or reinforcing consequences of breakfast eating seems necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reddan et al (32) reported that students believed eating breakfast may help to increase energy and to enhance attention in school. So, in order to increase the effect of nutrition education interventions, an emphasis on increasing the knowledge of students and their parents about positive or reinforcing consequences of breakfast eating seems necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…47 Various reasons for skipping breakfast such as lack of time or not being hungry in the morning can be observed. 48 Cho et al 49 have also observed that some types of breakfast , like meat and eggs and breakfast skippers were associated with the highest BMI values.…”
Section: Dietary Intake and Food Habits La Moreno Et Almentioning
confidence: 94%
“…H5-KIDS used a combination of theoretical models to guide development including social cognitive theory and an ecological framework. A key model construct was reciprocal determinism, suggesting characteristics of the person, the person's behavior, and the environment are in constant interaction with paths of influence operating in multiple directions (Bandura, 1989, Pakenham, et al, 2002, Reddan, et al, 2002. Intervention strategies targeted the intrapersonal environment of the parent (e.g., knowledge, FV servings), interpersonal interactions between the parent and child (e.g., child-feeding practices, FV modeling), and the physical environment (e.g., FV availability in the home).…”
Section: Participatory Development Of H5-kidsmentioning
confidence: 99%