1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01548256
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's perception of gender-role-congruent and -incongruent behavior in peers: Fisher-price meets price waterhouse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the stereotype-activation hypothesis, peer maltreatment among girls with many female friends may not be attributed to gender atypical characteristics. This pattern of findings also speaks to the general finding within the gender development literature that girls experience less felt pressure to conform to gender norms than boys do (Carter and McCloskey 1984;Fagot 1977;Katz and Walsh 1991;McAninch et al 1996;Rachkowski and O'Grady 1988 gender nonconformity is seen as a social liability, particularly given the infrequency of cross-sex friendships during childhood (Kovacs et al 1996).…”
Section: Negative Peer Treatment and Friendship Processes In Girls' Gsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consistent with the stereotype-activation hypothesis, peer maltreatment among girls with many female friends may not be attributed to gender atypical characteristics. This pattern of findings also speaks to the general finding within the gender development literature that girls experience less felt pressure to conform to gender norms than boys do (Carter and McCloskey 1984;Fagot 1977;Katz and Walsh 1991;McAninch et al 1996;Rachkowski and O'Grady 1988 gender nonconformity is seen as a social liability, particularly given the infrequency of cross-sex friendships during childhood (Kovacs et al 1996).…”
Section: Negative Peer Treatment and Friendship Processes In Girls' Gsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Support for this proposition comes from research examining children's responses to displays of gender atypical behavior (e.g., Carter and McCloskey 1984;Fagot 1977Fagot , 1984Owen Blakemore 2003). Fagot (1977Fagot ( , 1984 observed that preschool children react negatively to peers' gender nonnormative behavior, and several studies have found that older children respond negatively to hypothetical children described as behaving in gender atypical ways (Carter and McCloskey 1984;McAninch et al 1996;Owen Blakemore 2003;Zucker et al 1995). There is little direct evidence, however, that negative peer feedback results in reduced gender atypicality.…”
Section: Gender Atypicality and Children's Negative Treatment From Peersmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has further been suggested that through interactions with others, children experience pressure to conform to gender norms, which may result in a reduction of genderatypical characteristics and greater adherence to gender expectations (Egan & Perry, 2001). Empirical work has furthermore found that children disapprove of peers who engage in gender-atypical behavior (Blakemore, 2003;Carter & McCloskey, 1984;Lobel, 1994;McAninch, Milich, Crumbo, & Funtowicz, 1996), especially gender-atypical boys who have been found to be more prone to adolescent bullying, and also psychological distress (Young & Sweeting, 2004) and lower levels of school adjustment (Ueno & McWilliams, 2010). Adolescence is a vulnerable time, and the felt pressure to participate in activities congruent with their gender may be high.…”
Section: The Influence From Parents and Peers On Gender Socializationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While research has suggested the existence of internal pressure to conform to gender stereotypes, the anticipation of real or perceived social reactions may be linked with competitiveness for females (Alagna, 1982;Brady, Trafimow, Eisler, & Southard 1996;Eagly, 1992;Fiske, 1991;McAninch, Milich, Crumbo, & Funtowicz, 1996). For example, Alagna (1982) found that women in her study, when given feedback that their peers disapproved of their competitiveness, expressed a decrease in their positive affect.…”
Section: Competitionmentioning
confidence: 95%