2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10643-015-0759-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children’s Perspective on Learning: An International Study in Denmark, Estonia, Germany and Sweden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Maria José, who was in the same focus group as Ruby, added, "Yeah, we read to get smart, and we get smarter to go to first grade." This framing of learning as the development of such academic skills as reading, which is tied to the "activities related to school," mimics the findings of Sandberg et al (2017) who found that children in Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and Sweden also "perceived learning as development of academic skills" (p. 79). Moreover, these kindergarteners' comments are similar to their statements about what kindergarten is (e.g., Andre) in which they appeared to connect this idea of getting smarter through learning to read to preparing themselves for first grade and beyond.…”
Section: Readingsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Maria José, who was in the same focus group as Ruby, added, "Yeah, we read to get smart, and we get smarter to go to first grade." This framing of learning as the development of such academic skills as reading, which is tied to the "activities related to school," mimics the findings of Sandberg et al (2017) who found that children in Denmark, Estonia, Germany, and Sweden also "perceived learning as development of academic skills" (p. 79). Moreover, these kindergarteners' comments are similar to their statements about what kindergarten is (e.g., Andre) in which they appeared to connect this idea of getting smarter through learning to read to preparing themselves for first grade and beyond.…”
Section: Readingsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similarly, pupil-teacher relationships built on care, mutual respect and trust are vital for promoting a positive learning environment. The significance of positive relationships in producing a school environment conducive to personal growth has led to research which highlights the inclusionary or exclusionary processes within the classroom and playground dynamics (Sandberg et al, 2017; Warming, 2019). School is thus a space which clearly locates children in a process of social and personal development, a process of ‘becoming’.…”
Section: Children’s Sense Of School Connectedness and Belongingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary focus of this body of literature has been on questions of power and the ways in which school communities can give children ‘voice’, to express their ideas and participate in decision-making processes (Bjerke, 2011; Robinson, 2014). Other studies have focused on children’s experiences of specific aspects of their school lives, such as learning (Sandberg et al, 2017) or children’s transitions within the school system (Booth et al, 2019). However, there are surprisingly few studies that have aimed to achieve a more general understanding of children’s perspectives on what ‘school’ means for them as a space of (non)belonging, as a collective experience and also as a process of becoming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We merged these two categories in this section following the principles of group discussions with children which are well documented in the literature and which aim at creating a secure, friendly and non-threatening environment for children to speak freely alongside their significant others, their peers (Barbour, 2008;Vaughn, Schumm and Sinagub, 1996). We also considered that one of the main differences we found between using focus groups-following the authors' definition-in few studies, such as those of Hammond, Hesterman and Knaus (2015) and Sandberg et al (2017), and using group discussions in studies like those from Adderley et al (2015), Green (2015) and Wahle et al (2017), was the way in which the discussion was structured and facilitated. However, the main aim was the same-listening to what children had to say in a safe environment where they feltvalued and heard.…”
Section: Universidad Pedagógica Nacional Colombiamentioning
confidence: 99%