1994
DOI: 10.1007/bf02686796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children’s understanding of television programmes: Three exploratory studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Van den Broek compared eight-, 11-, 14-, and 18-year-olds, and reported that eight-year-olds were more likely to give answers that relied on information within an episode or scene (close inferences), whereas older children were more likely to incorporate information across episodes (far inferences) to answer ''why'' questions. Thus the results of both of these studies suggest that younger children are less likely than older children to manipulate and work with content in order to make inferences (see also Sheppard, 1994).…”
Section: Ability To Make Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Van den Broek compared eight-, 11-, 14-, and 18-year-olds, and reported that eight-year-olds were more likely to give answers that relied on information within an episode or scene (close inferences), whereas older children were more likely to incorporate information across episodes (far inferences) to answer ''why'' questions. Thus the results of both of these studies suggest that younger children are less likely than older children to manipulate and work with content in order to make inferences (see also Sheppard, 1994).…”
Section: Ability To Make Inferencesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It was not until age 10 that children started spontaneously mentioning the characters' motives (see also Sheppard, 1994). Van den Broek (1997) has argued that young children's poorer performance on measures related to characters' internal states reflects an encoding deficit rather than a retrieval (memory) deficit.…”
Section: Comprehension Of Motives/goalsmentioning
confidence: 97%