2005
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bch421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Views of Family Group Conferences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Being involved in decision-making has a psychological impact of reducing stress and anxiety. Bell & Wilson (2006), UK FGC n = 15, age 6-16 Content Children's presence was an important factor in achieving change, at least in the short term. Holland and O′Neill (2006), UK FGC n = 25, age 6-18…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Being involved in decision-making has a psychological impact of reducing stress and anxiety. Bell & Wilson (2006), UK FGC n = 15, age 6-16 Content Children's presence was an important factor in achieving change, at least in the short term. Holland and O′Neill (2006), UK FGC n = 25, age 6-18…”
Section: Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Holland & Rivett (2008) found that Family Group Conferences (FGCs) often appeared to have a therapeutic effect for many families through the process of ‘meeting, expressing feelings, listening to each other and through the act of achieving something positive when previously they may have felt that they had not succeeded as a family’ (p. 32). Bell & Wilson (2006) found that children mostly valued the experience of being consulted and welcomed opportunities for families to develop relationships and work together on issues. The formality of the setting in a neutral venue with the presence of a facilitator or social worker leading the meeting often means that families are able to communicate more calmly, and that children are able to speak and be listened to.…”
Section: Therapeutic Effects Of Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, children appear to be primarily overlooked as a source of knowledge regarding FGC (Holland & Rivett, 2008). Those studies that do involve children tend to focus on programme satisfaction rather than their perceptions of outcomes (Bell & Wilson, 2006). The local variations of FGC practice raise questions of what authentic FGC practice is and how it is measured.…”
Section: Family Group Conferencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advocate, however, is not someone who will make decisions for a child or family (Barnardo's, 2002) as this would come into conflict with the aim of empowering family members to make their own decisions (Dalrymple, 2002). Bell and Wilson (2006) explored the views of 20 children from the ages of six to 16 who took part in a Family Group Conference. The research highlighted that there was a largely positive view from the children about being consulted and their families coming together to make decisions.…”
Section: Advantages Of Family Group Conferences Within the Public Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%