2015
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2015.1086770
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children With ADHD Show Impairments in Multiple Stages of Information Processing in a Stroop Task: An ERP Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies claimed that early ERP components jointly (e.g., P1, P2, and N2) capture perceptual processing and low-level attentional allocation (79, 80). Relatively small N2 amplitudes followed by relatively large P1 and P2 amplitudes would indicate that both automatic and facilitated processing of negative information are manifest (81, 82). The automatic nature of stimulus-driven processing reflects the cognitive schemata of HTA individuals in which tests/examinations are automatically treated as threatening (Beck’s theory) (83).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies claimed that early ERP components jointly (e.g., P1, P2, and N2) capture perceptual processing and low-level attentional allocation (79, 80). Relatively small N2 amplitudes followed by relatively large P1 and P2 amplitudes would indicate that both automatic and facilitated processing of negative information are manifest (81, 82). The automatic nature of stimulus-driven processing reflects the cognitive schemata of HTA individuals in which tests/examinations are automatically treated as threatening (Beck’s theory) (83).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in NS, the fact that no inhibitory control deficit was observed in the perceptual processing stage in HTA individuals may be because NS does not include emotional stimuli; as such, hypervigilance and related automatic processing were simply not activated. However, despite the fact that no inhibitory control deficit was observed in the perceptual processing stage, in NS, deficits in cognitive processing were still observed, indicating that HTA individuals may suffer from extensive inhibitory deficits (81). Particularly, HTA individuals were not only found to have difficulty in inhibiting the incongruent interference, an interference that negatively impacts task completion (see similar results) (92, 93), but were also found to have difficulty in inhibiting the congruent interference, an interference that facilitates a quick accomplishment of the task at hand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ERP, a larger P1 (100 ms post-stimulus) amplitude has been seen in children with ADHD compared to controls; a finding that was interpreted as a compensatory mechanism in the absence of performance differences (Kóbor et al, 2015; Shahaf et al, 2012). In contrast, when children with ADHD made more omission errors than controls, P1 amplitude was significantly reduced (Nazari et al, 2010).…”
Section: A Comparative Analysis Of Adhd and Mind Wanderingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For yet another example in the area of attention, consider the study by Kóbor et al (2015). They tested children with and without ADHD in a Stroop task.…”
Section: The Ex-gaussian As a Descriptive And Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%