2018
DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2018.1461073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children with disabilities in Swedish child welfare – a differentiating and disabling practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Sweden, personal social services (PSS) are organized into three domains: social assistance, substance abuse treatment and child welfare (Stranz et al, 2016). CWS in Sweden is often described as family oriented with a focus on preventive work and family support (Engwall et al, 2019). The educational programme consisted of a teacher's guide (structured teaching material) primarily including information about the CWS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sweden, personal social services (PSS) are organized into three domains: social assistance, substance abuse treatment and child welfare (Stranz et al, 2016). CWS in Sweden is often described as family oriented with a focus on preventive work and family support (Engwall et al, 2019). The educational programme consisted of a teacher's guide (structured teaching material) primarily including information about the CWS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Swedish disability policy is based partly on general welfare policy, including universal child benefit, and partly on interventions aimed specifically at people with disabilities (Engwall et al 2018). The emergence of the Scandinavian welfare-state ideology saw the development of ideals of 'normalisation' (Kristiansen 1999), which implied an aim to integrate disabled people into society by allowing disabled children to grow up at home and by providing them with education and medical care within the mainstream systems (SOU 1964:43).…”
Section: The Swedish Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Engwall et al, 2019(Engwall et al, : 1028 • 'What do you need to find out to judge what support is needed?' (Engwall et al, 2019(Engwall et al, : 1028 The opening questions start the conversation and ideally the participant's narrative will then cover all aspects of the research with minimal prompts. Open-ended questions invite long, detailed responses, especially when participants are given space and the researcher is listening and comfortable with silence to only interject once the participant has stopped talking.…”
Section: Vignettes In Semi-structured Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open, initial question invites the participants to talk by asking them what they would do (Roets et al, 2016) or what they are thinking (Ghanem et al, 2018). Examples are as follows:• ‘What comes to your mind when you read about this family?’ (Bain, 2008: 81, 2020)• ‘What action would you take?’ (Bain, 2008: 81, 2020)• ‘How would you work with the family?’ (Bain, 2008: 81, 2020)• ‘Please tell me how you would typically proceed in this case?’ (Enroos et al, 2017: 10)• ‘Tell me your first steps in managing this case?’ (Taylor et al, 2021: 3)• ‘Describe your initial thoughts about what is happening in the scenario’ (Aujla, 2020: 4)• ‘How would you reason in this case?’ (Engwall et al, 2019: 1028)• ‘What do you need to find out to judge what support is needed?’ (Engwall et al, 2019: 1028)…”
Section: Designing a Text-based Vignettementioning
confidence: 99%