“…Furthermore, children may produce utterances that are underinformative for listeners because of limitations in cognitive abilities such as working memory and inhibition, or mentalizing skills such as Theory of Mind (Allen, Skarabela, & Hughes, 2008;Bannard et al, 2017;Brown-Schmidt, 2009;Epley, Morewedge, & Keysar, 2004;Nilsen & Fecica, 2011;Nilsen & Graham, 2009;Nilsen, Varghese, Xu, & Fecica, 2015;Wardlow & Heyman, 2016). In support of this possibility, informative language use in children during reference disambiguation tasks is associated with increased ability to explicitly report what each conversational partner knows (Roberts & Patterson, 1983), better performance on independent Theory of Mind tasks (Resches & P erez Pereira, 2007), and stronger working memory (e.g., Nilsen & Graham, 2009;Nilsen et al, 2015;Wardlow & Heyman, 2016). At present, however, it is not clear whether standardized, global measures of cognitive skills are the best predictor of the entire range of children's pragmatic abilities or whether different types of adjustments to listeners engage specific cognitive mechanisms to different degrees (see also Roberts & Patterson, 1983;Wardlow & Heyman, 2016).…”