2003
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02441-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chimeric 16S rDNA sequences of diverse origin are accumulating in the public databases

Abstract: A significant number of chimeric 16S rDNA sequences of diverse origin were identified in the public databases by partial treeing analysis. This suggests that chimeric sequences, representing phylogenetically novel non-existent organisms, are routinely being overlooked in molecular phylogenetic surveys despite a general awareness of PCR-generated artefacts amongst researchers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
166
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
166
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Novel DNA-sequencing methods using shorter DNA read length should result in even fewer chimeric junctions per read as demonstrated for single cells by the 454 Life Sciences method (Marcy et al, 2007a). Nevertheless, the appearance of MDA-associated chimeras in databases of environmental DNA sequences is a concern, as has already occurred for the PCR method in the case of ribosomal sequence databases (Hugenholtz and Huber, 2003;Ashelford et al, 2005). It will be important to reduce the formation of chimeras further, and identifying their cause (Lasken and Stockwell, 2007) is a substantial step in this direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novel DNA-sequencing methods using shorter DNA read length should result in even fewer chimeric junctions per read as demonstrated for single cells by the 454 Life Sciences method (Marcy et al, 2007a). Nevertheless, the appearance of MDA-associated chimeras in databases of environmental DNA sequences is a concern, as has already occurred for the PCR method in the case of ribosomal sequence databases (Hugenholtz and Huber, 2003;Ashelford et al, 2005). It will be important to reduce the formation of chimeras further, and identifying their cause (Lasken and Stockwell, 2007) is a substantial step in this direction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D1-D2 LSU rDNA fragments show virtually no intraspecific variations while discriminating morphospecies that split in the Pleistocene. Unambiguous LSU rDNA sequences were first screened for chimeras using Check-Chimera (36), then double checked by thorough visual inspection of all sequences producing abnormally long branches in neighbor-joining trees (37) as described in Hugenholtz and Huber (38). This conservative approach led to the removal of Ï·13% of putative chimeric sequences from subsequent analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequences were edited using Sequencer DNA sequencing software (Gene Codes Inc.). Checks for chimeric sequences were conducted using the CHECK_CHIMERA program from the Ribosomal Database Project (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu) and the program BELLEROPHON (Hugenholtz & Huber, 2003). 16S rRNA gene sequences of selected relatives within the phylum Bacteroidetes were compiled and aligned using the automatic nucleic acid aligner in the ARB software package (Ludwig et al, 2004), and alignments were refined manually.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%