2003
DOI: 10.1080/1067056022000054623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China Perceives America: Perspectives of international relations experts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…186 Intellectuals were, in fact, very diversified in their opinions, which have influenced public opinion in return. Apparently, as seen from various polls and Internet discussion messages in both cases, nonliberals received more public support.…”
Section: Conclusion: Rivalry Under the Same Roof?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…186 Intellectuals were, in fact, very diversified in their opinions, which have influenced public opinion in return. Apparently, as seen from various polls and Internet discussion messages in both cases, nonliberals received more public support.…”
Section: Conclusion: Rivalry Under the Same Roof?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…• Hegemonic: US foreign policy would spread the values and ideas that the US government deemed important. These 'American values' and ideas were usually referred to, with only limited clarification, using words or concepts such as freedom, democracy, prosperity, and security (see also Blum, 2003;Chen, 2003). • Unilateralist: the US would make decisions on international affairs after only minimal consultation with other states (see also Lake, 2006;Skidmore, 2005).…”
Section: Us Foreign Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the terrorist attacks in the north-eastern US of 11 September 2001, US foreign policy retained these three core elements but reinterpreted them (Beeson and Higgott, 2005;Leffler, 2005;Parmer, 2005;Skidmore, 2005;US Government, 2002). Unilateralism became 'a new multilateralism' meaning that 'the United States unilaterally defines a global agenda that everyone who agrees with is welcome to accomplish alongside the United States' (Camroux and Okfen, 2004; see also Chen, 2003;Dunne, 2003). This approach could also be called 'a new unilateralism'.…”
Section: Us Foreign Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the end of the cold war, countries in different parts of the world began to become visible with the economic power they caught, and they argued that an order in which many powers would be effective, not just one power, was adopted in the world economy (Chen, 2003;Poyraz, 2019). The conflicts, especially due to lack of resources, forced the formation of different economic unions and created alternative economic power centers to the USA and liberal economic thought.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%