China’s Industrial Clusters: Building AI-Driven Bio-Discovery Capacity

Puglisi, Anna B.; Chou, Daniel

doi:10.51593/20220012

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Boosting the Domestic Innovation Base1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Other1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent3

Authors

Journals

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The government views these industrial clusters as a way to capitalize on AI applications that could lead to a "transformation of China from a biotech power to a biotech superpower." 36 While nascent, such research clustering and the subsequent impacts of using AI for biological discovery could have broad and concerning commercial, ethical, and national security implications. 37…”

Section: Boosting the Domestic Innovation Basementioning

confidence: 99%

The PRC’s Domestic Approach

Daniels

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Boosting the Domestic Innovation Basementioning

confidence: 99%

The PRC’s Domestic Approach

Daniels

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Practice makes perfect: Using the total cost of ownership to teach global locational decision making

Woldt,

Prasad,

Stapleton

2024

Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bioeconomy is an emerging concept and no commonly accepted definition has been given so far. Bioeconomy strategies attempt to cover every aspect of this emerging concept from a different perspective, depending on the country, region, or organisation issuing them. For these reasons, each strategy has its own priority fields depending on the economic, geomorphological, social, ecological, and technological conditions of each country. In this review, an attempt is made to study the priority fields of bioeconomy strategies through a systematic review of the literature. PRISMA analysis was used to review the literature on the priority fields of bioeconomy strategies. The review examined the issue in the rich academic literature of two databases, Scopus and AgEcon. Using a repeatable search process to identify relevant studies in the literature, only 68 publications met the eligibility criteria that were included in the review. The results show that there are trends in the priority fields of bioeconomy strategies in the years 2013–2022. Moreover, the economic and technological development of the respective countries foreshadows their priorities. A successful transition to a bioeconomic model requires the participation of society as a whole, because a sustainable society as a whole requires sustainable and environmentally friendly solutions. The study concludes that governance with global coordination and stakeholder training is needed for successful implementation of bioeconomy strategies.

show abstract

China’s Industrial Clusters: Building AI-Driven Bio-Discovery Capacity

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

The PRC’s Domestic Approach

The PRC’s Domestic Approach

Practice makes perfect: Using the total cost of ownership to teach global locational decision making

Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About