China’s Policy on Science and Technology: Implications for the Next Industrial Transition

Abstract

Since the formation of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, Science and Technology (S&T) has been the focus area for Chinese economic development. However, little was known about China’s scientific mission, working and policies till the end of 1978. Based on the studies and the developments made, one can say that China’s S&T policy has evolved through four phases. The first phase (1949–1959) supported the development of heavy industries along the Soviet lines; the second phase (1959–1976) witnessed economic stagnation and ideological domination of technology projects; the third phase (1976–2001) focused on market-driven and product-driven research and now in her fourth phase of S&T development, since 2002, China has aimed to develop high technology industries and the nascent clean-energy or green technology with a focus on innovation. These policy changes entirely reformed the way China’s industrial enterprises are being managed today as compared to earlier years. However, some thinkers do not consider these reforms as sweeping or successful. In order to better appreciate the implications of the S&T policy in China’s industrial transition, the article analyses the role and effects of the policy that has assisted in enhancing the country’s S&T strength and improving the competitiveness, while supporting its economic and social development.

The impact of technological innovation and public‐private partnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption‐based carbon emissions analysis

“…Chinese government, unlike other countries, steers the quantity, quality, and direction of research and development (R&D). The S&T plans specifically focus the quantitative targets, which are to be achieved by 2020 including 2.5% investment of GDP in R&D, lowering the country dependence on imported technologies to 30%, increasing the technological advancement contribution to economic growth by 60%, and joining the five top countries of the world in terms of the number of patents granted for domestic inventions (Agarwala & Chaudhary, 2019). The S&T approach also set quantitative targets such as elevating the level of indigenous innovations, achieving development in targeted scientific areas, and making enterprises the driving force of the innovation system.…”

‘Made in China 2025’: Poised for Success?

“…Studies indicate that there is a gap between the supply and demand of skilled manpower in China (Morgan, 2016). Realising this drawback, the Chinese government has taken various steps to strengthen the education system both at the primary, higher and vocational levels (Agarwala & Chaudhary, 2019). In addition to these, the focus now is on vocational education to ensure a continuous availability of trained and skilled manpower to achieve the goals of MIC25.…”

“…As noted by the authors (Agarwala & Chaudhary, 2019) Science and Technology (S&T) has been the focus area of China for their economic development since 1949. Since 2002, China has aimed to develop high technology industries and the nascent green technology with a focus on innovation.…”

“…With a reduced rate of economic growth becoming the new normal , China changed its development model to focus on private consumption, services, and innovation rather than fixed investment and manufactured exports. In order to do all these alongside providing support for sustainable industrial advancement, three critical factors, namely human capital, export structure and productivity have been addressed through various policy changes (Agarwala & Chaudhary, 2019). While human capital was addressed by focusing on education, export structure and productivity were done through industrial restructuring efforts.…”

A revisit of National Science & Technology Policy for the development of small and medium enterprises in Sri Lanka

“…Then continuing progress in biotechnology, nanotechnology, and ICT promises further improvements in living standards and economic performance. Moreover, establishing world-class research centers to carry out cutting-edge research in areas important for national development is a key strategy in this scenario (Agarwala and Chaudhary, 2019;Kim, 2007). In addition to strengthening existing R&D institutions, such as ACCIMT, NERD centre, and biotechnology at universities and ITI, establishing world-class new research centres with advanced facilities in emerging technologies of national importance, such as nanotechnology, radioactivity use to improve the export market will be good targets for the country's R&D effort.…”