Federal Rivers 2014
DOI: 10.4337/9781781955055.00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China's political system, economic reform and the governance of water quality in the Pearl River Basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Chinese context, this is less surprising. However, it is important to note there is a trend of locally driven collaboration among a number of (semi-)governmental stakeholders with divergent interests, as also shown in previous research on the Pearl River and the Xijiang sub-basin (Silveira 2014). All in all, even within an increasingly polycentric system of natural resource governance, with increasingly important roles for market and civil society actors (McGinnis and Ostrom 2010), the state holds decisive cards both in the Chinese and European contexts, albeit in different ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Chinese context, this is less surprising. However, it is important to note there is a trend of locally driven collaboration among a number of (semi-)governmental stakeholders with divergent interests, as also shown in previous research on the Pearl River and the Xijiang sub-basin (Silveira 2014). All in all, even within an increasingly polycentric system of natural resource governance, with increasingly important roles for market and civil society actors (McGinnis and Ostrom 2010), the state holds decisive cards both in the Chinese and European contexts, albeit in different ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Chinese context, informal institutions permeate all levels of administration and facilitate exchange of important information as well as decision-making. This seems to contribute to an improved capacity to monitor and understand catchment environmental processes (Silveira 2014). In addition, personal networks have played important roles in the bargaining processes determining how laws and policies are to be ultimately implemented by local governments (Zheng 2006).…”
Section: A Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are nine national-level ministries involved in water administration and policy within China. The MWR is charged with many aspects of water resource policy formulation and coordination, although some of its mandates overlap with those of other ministries and legislation resulting in some lack of clarity as to which mandates belong to which ministries (Feng et al, 2006;Silviera, 2014). MWR is divided into a number of departments and seven River Commissions, and bears principal responsibility for coordinating activity in transboundary (inter-provincial and multi-national) surface water resources.…”
Section: Water Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…China also has its strengths and weaknesses in water environment governance due to its unique political and administrative system. In China, the Central Government can pool resources and coordinate arrangements to address watershed governance issues on a national scale [5]. Over the past 50 years, the Government has invested massively in water management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, watershed governance is primarily based on administrative boundaries, rather than at the watershed level. Each jurisdictional subject seeks to achieve its objectives and is not obliged to consider the subsequent impacts of its actions [5]. There is the potential for competition and inefficiency in time and space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%