2022
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac5769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

China’s power transformation may drastically change employment patterns in the power sector and its upstream supply chains

Abstract: China’s power sector as the major CO2 emitter has experienced significant restructuring, which has profound impacts on employment in both power and its upstream sectors. Combining the input-output and structural path analysis, we quantified the direct and indirect impacts of power transformation on employment in China during 2012-2017. The direct employment in power generation sector witnessed a net growth of 0.12 million, while over ten times of jobs (1.40 million) have been lost in the upstream sectors, main… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results for wind and solar installed capacities are similar to studies that assumed recent cost projections for these technologies [26], but they are greater than others that imposed limitations on the growth of manufacturing capacities [32]. Compared to the employment effects in our study, the estimate from Zhang et al [7] is 40% lower than ours due to the omission of the indirect employment impacts from a life-cycle perspective (table S10), and the estimate from Zhou et al [9] is 60% lower than ours due to the omission of the private sector employment (table S11). Similarly, our estimates of premature deaths in 2020 under the Reference scenario are lower than those of other studies because of higher shares of clean energy in 2020 and our assumption that the emission standards have perfect compliance (table S17) [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our results for wind and solar installed capacities are similar to studies that assumed recent cost projections for these technologies [26], but they are greater than others that imposed limitations on the growth of manufacturing capacities [32]. Compared to the employment effects in our study, the estimate from Zhang et al [7] is 40% lower than ours due to the omission of the indirect employment impacts from a life-cycle perspective (table S10), and the estimate from Zhou et al [9] is 60% lower than ours due to the omission of the private sector employment (table S11). Similarly, our estimates of premature deaths in 2020 under the Reference scenario are lower than those of other studies because of higher shares of clean energy in 2020 and our assumption that the emission standards have perfect compliance (table S17) [3].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This highlights the importance of adequate measures to compensate for economic and socioeconomic effects of coal mine closures. Renewable energy and other energy transition related industries could offer alternative employment and economic development opportunities [69,70]. National and international funds to provide structural change assistance to affected regions, as well as stakeholder integration in policy processes can furthermore contribute to increase stakeholder consent to phasing out coal production [71,72].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photovoltaic power generation, one of the new energy sources, can boost employment in upstream manufacturing, PV plant operation, and maintenance, creating 45,000 jobs for every 1 TWh increase in solar PV power generation in China ( 54 ). PV will provide more than twice as many jobs as thermal plants in the 2°C scenario, and this ratio will increase to about six times in the 1.5°C scenario ( 55 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%