China’s regulatory framework for outward foreign direct investment

Abstract

China has become the world's third largest outward investor, behind the United States and Japan. A growing body of literature suggests that China's regulatory framework for outward foreign direct investment (OFDI) is a determinant of the country's rising OFDI. This paper presents a holistic review of that framework, including some possibilities for its improvement. Overall, China's framework serves two objectives: to help Chinese firms become more competitive internationally and to assist the country in its development effort. In pursuing these objectives, the regulatory framework has moved from restricting, to facilitating, to supporting, to encouraging OFDI; but there are still strong elements of administrative control that make it cumbersome. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) seem to benefit particularly from the current framework when internationalizing through FDI.

Chinese Economic Statecraft and U.S. Hegemony in Latin America: An Empirical Analysis, 2003–2014

“…Recently, some authors have started to pay attention to the political underpinnings of Chinese investments, highlighting the special influence that government agencies hold over the decisionmaking of Chinese multinational enterprises (MNEs) (Luo et al 2010;Sauvant and Chen 2014;Nolan 2014). In a patent example of accommodation, the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) asked Chinese embassies and consulates in host countries to review investments and determine if they were on the MOFCOM "blacklist" or if the proposed investment would affect the interests of a third country (Sauvant and Chen 2014, 147).…”

China, the G20 and the International Investment Regime

“…They need assistance, not only to obtain more FDI, but also sustainable FDI. Such a program would complement the WTO-led Aid for Trade Initiative and the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA, which focuses on practical issues related to 22 China has a "going out" strategy refl ecting precisely these objectives; see Sauvant and Chen (2014). Such a program would concentrate on practical ways and means, the "nuts and bolts," of encouraging the fl ow of sustainable FDI to developing countries, and, in particular, the least developed among them.…”

Determinants of Chinese Direct Investments in the European Union

“…Other potential candidates, such as labour costs, openness to trade or the industrial structure have been widely discussed in the literature, but the findings with regards to these are much more controversial (Blonigen, 2005). It should be noted that China's institutional setting is different compared to other countries, as Chinese investors operate under specific conditions (Sauvant and Chen, 2013). They usually do not have a competitive advantage over the firms in the host country, even in the case of a GI.…”