2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2008.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese authors do need CONSORT: Reporting quality assessment for five leading Chinese medical journals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
52
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, what we found with regard to reporting quality in the Chinese studies is consistent with a recent systematic review of the quality of Chinese RCTs 142 and a review of reporting quality in leading Chinese medical journals, 126 both undertaken by the Chinese Cochrane Centre. There are initiatives to improve trial conduct and reporting in China, and such initiatives are already having an effect elsewhere, although reporting is still not all that it should be.…”
Section: Chinese Studies Of Head Coolingsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, what we found with regard to reporting quality in the Chinese studies is consistent with a recent systematic review of the quality of Chinese RCTs 142 and a review of reporting quality in leading Chinese medical journals, 126 both undertaken by the Chinese Cochrane Centre. There are initiatives to improve trial conduct and reporting in China, and such initiatives are already having an effect elsewhere, although reporting is still not all that it should be.…”
Section: Chinese Studies Of Head Coolingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It may be partly explained by lack of formal training in research methods and failure of journals to adopt reporting criteria such as CONSORT, 126,127 but is not limited to Chinese trials 124 (and see Appendix 6).…”
Section: Chinese Studies Of Head Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the results of this study and previous Chinese studies (17,18) (19). Previous studies reported that the involvement of a trial methodologist (epidemiologist or biostatistician) improves reporting quality (26,27).…”
Section: And More Than 80% Of Reports Included Each Of These Items Wimentioning
confidence: 52%
“…While these studies examined particular medical fields or journals, they did not address these issues based on geographical region. A recent regional study evaluating the adherence of Chinese RCT reports to the CONSORT statement revealed the need for improvement of reporting quality (17,18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WoS offers a significant advantage for literature reviews in some particular fields [5,6], especially for efforts to understand overall trends [7,8]. Previous studies have evaluated Chinese neurosurgical publications, but they only focused on local Chinese journals [9] or carried out only superficial research on Chinese neurosurgical publications [10]. The aim of this study was to comprehensively analyze neurosurgical publications in China using the WoS database.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%