2015
DOI: 10.1057/biosoc.2015.34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese biotech versus international ethics? Accounting for the China–America CRISPR ethical divide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When a team of researchers from Sun Yat‐sen University in Guangdong used the CRISPR‐Cas9 technology to modify a disease‐causing gene in human embryos, they restricted their experiment by using non‐viable tri‐pronuclear zygotes . However, even this self‐restriction did not go far enough for Nature and Science, which both rejected their study . Although the results were eventually published elsewhere , the initial rejections demonstrate the influence of journals on the conduct of research.…”
Section: From Asilomar To Napamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a team of researchers from Sun Yat‐sen University in Guangdong used the CRISPR‐Cas9 technology to modify a disease‐causing gene in human embryos, they restricted their experiment by using non‐viable tri‐pronuclear zygotes . However, even this self‐restriction did not go far enough for Nature and Science, which both rejected their study . Although the results were eventually published elsewhere , the initial rejections demonstrate the influence of journals on the conduct of research.…”
Section: From Asilomar To Napamentioning
confidence: 99%