2015
DOI: 10.3991/ijet.v10i5.4819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese Faculty Members’ Open Educational Resources (OER) Usage Status and the Barriers to OER Development and Usage

Abstract: Abstract-The purpose of this study was to investigate faculty members' usage of Open Educational Resources (OER) as well as the barriers to OER development and usage. 360 faculty members from Zhejiang University (ZJU) in China were randomly selected to complete a survey. The study found that: (1) most of surveyed faculty members rarely utilized OER, while they had some awareness of sharing educational resources; (2) the majority noticed online educational materials published for learning or reference, while th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This framework covers 35 quality criteria across five quality domains, namely teaching resources development and management, teaching process management, learning support services, teaching management, and teaching and learning environment [23]. Furthermore, Guo, Zhang, Bonk, and Li [24] reported that several Chinese universities, such as Tsinghua and Shanghai Jiaotong Universities, have taken the initiative to build their own local Massive Open Educational Resources Courses (MOOCs) platforms such as "Xuetang online" and "CNMOOC". McGreal [25] highlighted that despite the fact that in many cases the content of MOOCs is not released with an open license, these courses can be considered the offspring of the OER movement.…”
Section: What Policies and Initiatives Have Been Launched To Support mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This framework covers 35 quality criteria across five quality domains, namely teaching resources development and management, teaching process management, learning support services, teaching management, and teaching and learning environment [23]. Furthermore, Guo, Zhang, Bonk, and Li [24] reported that several Chinese universities, such as Tsinghua and Shanghai Jiaotong Universities, have taken the initiative to build their own local Massive Open Educational Resources Courses (MOOCs) platforms such as "Xuetang online" and "CNMOOC". McGreal [25] highlighted that despite the fact that in many cases the content of MOOCs is not released with an open license, these courses can be considered the offspring of the OER movement.…”
Section: What Policies and Initiatives Have Been Launched To Support mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo, Zhang, Bonk, and Li [24] and Zhang and Li [44] investigated the perception of faculty members towards OER at Zhejiang University (ZJU) in China. They found that the majority of faculty had a positive perception about OER and were willing to publish their OER online.…”
Section: Perceptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers are conducted to improve the learning effectiveness by utilizing OER both from the teacher and students sides in multiple aspects such as belief, motivation, learning result, and thinking skills. The researchers result sustainably contributes to the policy and strategy for better OER management (Guo et al, 2015;Obradović et al, 2016;Piedra et al, 2015).…”
Section: Open Educational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through this technology, students can access vast unlimited information. This technique becomes an opportunity for teachers to improve the learning process (Guo et al, 2015;Kaendler et al, 2015;Newhouse, 2015). Now, there are numerous learning sources to obtain to support the learning process in achieving specific competencies Krajcso, 2016;Piedra et al, 2015).…”
Section: Open Educational Resourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation