2022
DOI: 10.1080/10357823.2022.2040429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese Nationalism through the Prism of the Sino–Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is best captured by Global Times (2020) which announces that “The so-called ‘beacon of democracy’ now becomes dim and lacklustre.” Similarly, by reporting excessively negatively on BLM protests and protestors, the Chinese media underlines an association between social movements and the “chaos” and “instability” they can bring, which has been long favoured by the party-state. This is in line with previous studies that show how protests are often censored or selectively reported in the Chinese state media to maintain stability and where possible boost the party's legitimacy (Burcu, 2023). In other words, the description of heightened tensions and unrest at the scene of protests in the US indirectly consolidates the party-state's regime legitimacy by “validating” and reinforcing its “stability” discourse.…”
Section: Findings and Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is best captured by Global Times (2020) which announces that “The so-called ‘beacon of democracy’ now becomes dim and lacklustre.” Similarly, by reporting excessively negatively on BLM protests and protestors, the Chinese media underlines an association between social movements and the “chaos” and “instability” they can bring, which has been long favoured by the party-state. This is in line with previous studies that show how protests are often censored or selectively reported in the Chinese state media to maintain stability and where possible boost the party's legitimacy (Burcu, 2023). In other words, the description of heightened tensions and unrest at the scene of protests in the US indirectly consolidates the party-state's regime legitimacy by “validating” and reinforcing its “stability” discourse.…”
Section: Findings and Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Firstly, Chinese media coverage of BLM mainly serves its domestic agenda of generating cohesion, a key task of the propaganda work (Brady, 2012; Edney, 2015). As a multi-faceted propaganda tool, the BLM coverage confirms key findings from Chinese propaganda studies – it promotes “stability triumphs all” (Sandby-Thomas, 2010) by highlighting the chaos associated with protests; it distracts the public's attention from undesirable and sensitive news (Brady, 2012) by avoiding discussing Xinjiang, race, and ethnicity within China, and by actively criticising the US instead; and it constructs a “us vs. them” dichotomy (Burcu, 2023; Luqiu, 2018) by taking an aggressive anti-US rhetoric and glorifying itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation