2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2022.101623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chinese translation of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA 3.0): Psychometric properties and measurement invariance across sex and age in adolescents, young adults, and adult men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher total scores reflect higher levels of disordered eating over the previous 7 days. In previous research, the EDE‐QS showed good internal consistency reliability and convergent validity in Chinese young adults and adolescents (He et al, 2021, 2022). In the present study, the C‐EDE‐QS had Cronbach's α values of .88 in T1 and .91 in T2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher total scores reflect higher levels of disordered eating over the previous 7 days. In previous research, the EDE‐QS showed good internal consistency reliability and convergent validity in Chinese young adults and adolescents (He et al, 2021, 2022). In the present study, the C‐EDE‐QS had Cronbach's α values of .88 in T1 and .91 in T2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Higher total scores on the CIA 3.0 indicate higher levels of psychosocial impairment. The CIA 3.0 has been translated into Mandarin Chinese with good internal consistency reliability, test–retest reliability, and convergent validity in Chinese populations, including Chinese adolescents (He et al, 2022). In the present study, the C‐CIA 3.0 had Cronbach's α values of .95 in T1 and .96 in T2.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, one participant aged 75 years of age was further removed in post hoc data cleaning, as all other participants were aged from 18 to 59 years. To evaluate the 2‐week test–retest reliability of the MOET, as in previous studies (e.g., He, Brytek‐Matera, et al, 2022; Polnay et al, 2021), a second survey was conducted. Specifically, we recruited 250 new participants in the second survey by not allowing those in the first survey to participate in the second survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All items were summed to get a total score, and higher scores indicated greater psychosocial impairment due to eating disorder symptomatology. The CIA 3.0 has been translated and validated in the Chinese context, and the CIA 3.0 showed good internal consistency reliability ( α = .96), test–retest reliability, known‐group validity, and convergent validity in Chinese young adult men and women (He, Brytek‐Matera, et al, 2022). In the current study, the CIA 3.0 had a Cronbach's α of .91 and a McDonald's ω of .91.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Chinese version of the 16‐item Clinical Impairment Assessment 3.0 (CIA 3.0; Bohn & Fairburn, 2008; He et al, 2022) was used to evaluate psychosocial functioning due to eating disorder symptomatology. Items are rated on a 4‐point Likert scale, from 0 (Not at all) to 3 (A lot).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%