2020
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chipper: Open‐source software for semi‐automated segmentation and analysis of birdsong and other natural sounds

Abstract: Audio recording devices have changed significantly over the last 50 years, making large datasets of recordings of natural sounds, such as birdsong, easier to obtain. This increase in digital recordings necessitates an increase in high‐throughput methods of analysis for researchers. Specifically, there is a need in the community for open‐source methods that are tailored to recordings of varying qualities and from multiple species collected in nature. We developed Chipper, a Python‐based software to semi‐automat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a previous study, we gathered and analyzed field-site and community-science recordings of chipping sparrows across the species’ entire breeding range ( Fig. S1 ), measuring numerous acoustic features of each song and classifying the syllables into distinct types and categories (Searfoss, Liu, et al, 2020; Searfoss, Pino, et al, 2020). A number of recorded songs in our previous analysis (Searfoss, Liu, et al, 2020) did not have a recording date listed; however, by revisiting the original field recording notes we were able to find the years for all recordings for our study presented here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a previous study, we gathered and analyzed field-site and community-science recordings of chipping sparrows across the species’ entire breeding range ( Fig. S1 ), measuring numerous acoustic features of each song and classifying the syllables into distinct types and categories (Searfoss, Liu, et al, 2020; Searfoss, Pino, et al, 2020). A number of recorded songs in our previous analysis (Searfoss, Liu, et al, 2020) did not have a recording date listed; however, by revisiting the original field recording notes we were able to find the years for all recordings for our study presented here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we used the song-analysis software Chipper to extract eight song features from each recording: mean intersyllable silence duration, mean syllable duration, mean syllable frequency range, mean syllable minimum and maximum frequency, duration of song bout, mean syllable stereotypy, and total number of syllables. Chipper allows the user to visualize each song bout, and it predicts where syllable boundaries are located using fluctuations in the amplitude of the signal (Searfoss, Pino, et al, 2020). The user can change the signal-to-noise threshold, apply lowpass and highpass filters to exclude high-frequency and low-frequency noise, respectively, and manually correct these syllable boundaries if necessary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In those cases, and depending on data volume, segmentation might better be performed either manually or in a semi‐automated way. For example, one could use chipper (Searfoss et al, 2020) or train a neural network like TweetyNet, (Cohen et al, 2022) on a manually annotated subset of the data.…”
Section: Pykanto: Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major roadblock to scaling up many analyses is that they require researchers to annotate song. Annotation is a time-consuming process done by hand with graphical user interface (GUI) applications, for example Praat, Audacity, Chipper ( Boersma and Weenink, 2021 ; Audacity Team, 2019 ; Searfoss et al, 2020 ). To annotate birdsong, researchers follow a two-step process ( Thompson et al, 2012 ; Kershenbaum et al, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%