2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3079-1_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ChIPseq in Yeast Species: From Chromatin Immunoprecipitation to High-Throughput Sequencing and Bioinformatics Data Analyses

Abstract: Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) followed by high-throughput sequencing (ChIPseq) is a powerful technique for the genome-wide location of protein DNA-binding sites. The ChIP experiment consists in treating living cells with a cross-linking agent to bind proteins to their DNA substrates. After fragmentation of DNA, specific fractions associated with a particular protein of interest are purified by immunoaffinity. They are next sequenced and identified on the reference genome using dedicated bioinformatics p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cross-linking of the cells and ChIP were performed as described previously 54 . The parental HTL (untagged strain) was grown and processed the same way to provide the mock-IP samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cross-linking of the cells and ChIP were performed as described previously 54 . The parental HTL (untagged strain) was grown and processed the same way to provide the mock-IP samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parental HTL (untagged strain) was grown and processed the same way to provide the mock-IP samples. Sequencing of the IPs, Input DNAs and mock IPs samples and primary data analyses (quality controls and mapping of the reads) were performed as described previously 54 . Peak calling was performed with the bpeaks software 51 , using both the Input DNA and the mock IP as references.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ChIP, myc-tagged CgYAP strains were grown in YPD until exponential phase (OD = 0.8) and then stressing agents were added for 30 min. Cross-linking of the cells and ChIP were performed as described previously (Lelandais et al, 2016 ). The parental ΔHTU (untagged strain) was grown and processed the same way to provide the mock-IP samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parental ΔHTU (untagged strain) was grown and processed the same way to provide the mock-IP samples. Sequencing of the IPs, Input DNAs and mock IPs samples and primary data analyses (quality controls and mapping of the reads) were performed as described previously (Lelandais et al, 2016 ). All experiments were performed twice and the reads of the replicate averaged before the peak calling step, except for CgYap5 for which one of the two replicates had poor read coverage and was not used for further analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoprecipitation was carried out by incubating the lysate with the monoclonal anti--FLAG M2-mouse primary antibody (Sigma Aldrich, F1804) and protein G Dynabead (Invitrogen, 10004D). Beads were washed sequentially in low salt, high salt and LiCl buffers, TE buffer and protein--DNA complex were eluted using elution buffer as reported earlier (Lelandais et al, 2016). Decrosslinking of the immuno--precipitated proteins were carried out by using a high concentration of NaCl and incubation at 65°C for 5 hours followed by proteinase--K treatment and DNA purification.…”
Section: Lysis and Chipmentioning
confidence: 99%