2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1503.07101
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral fermions, massless particles and Poincare covariance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference comes from the different choice of what one considers as "position": the cmodel is coupled to the e.m. field by viewing x in (2.1) as a position [1][2][3][4][5], with no attention paid at its "twisted" behavior under a Lorentz boost [6,[8][9][10]. In the S-model instead, the coupling is introduced in terms of the "true" position, r, which does transform in the usual way under a Lorentz boost [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference comes from the different choice of what one considers as "position": the cmodel is coupled to the e.m. field by viewing x in (2.1) as a position [1][2][3][4][5], with no attention paid at its "twisted" behavior under a Lorentz boost [6,[8][9][10]. In the S-model instead, the coupling is introduced in terms of the "true" position, r, which does transform in the usual way under a Lorentz boost [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The semiclassical chiral model (we call here the c-model ) allows for a derivation of the chiral magnetic effect and the chiral anomaly, respectively, bypassing complicated quantum calculations [1][2][3][4][5]. The free c-model, which has no genuine spin degree of freedom, carries a curious "twisted" Lorentz symmetry [6][7][8][9][10], conveniently derived by relating it to Souriau's massless spinning particle [11]. The latter (we call the S-model ), carries a mass-zero, spin-s Poincaré symmetry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%