2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.catcom.2008.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral iron(III)-salen-catalyzed oxidation of hydrocarbons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, conversions obtained are modest but the formation of cyclohexene oxide without serious competition from the production of cyclohexenol and cyclohexenone is noteworthy as it is known that cyclohexene is prone to allylic oxidation. This result is in contrast with the chiral iron(III)-salen catalyzed oxidation [30] of cyclohexene, where allylic oxidation dominates over epoxidation with much lower selectivity.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Thus, conversions obtained are modest but the formation of cyclohexene oxide without serious competition from the production of cyclohexenol and cyclohexenone is noteworthy as it is known that cyclohexene is prone to allylic oxidation. This result is in contrast with the chiral iron(III)-salen catalyzed oxidation [30] of cyclohexene, where allylic oxidation dominates over epoxidation with much lower selectivity.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Higher yields of up to 23% can be achieved using PhIO as the oxidant and catalysts bearing chiral salen ligands of type 42a-42d ( Figure 9). 115 Similarly to iron porphyrin complexes this increase in reactivity was attributed to the introduction of electron withdrawing substituents. However, both examples exhibit a lack of selectivity regarding the formation of alcohols and ketones as indicated by low A/K ratios.…”
Section: Iron Nonheme Complexes Bearing C- O-and S-donor Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors compare the performance of various CNN architectures, including AlexNet, VGGNet, and ResNet, in terms of accuracy and sensitivity. They discuss the strengths and limitations of each model and provide insights into the potential of deep-learning approaches for diabetic retinopathy recognition [2] [10].…”
Section: Existing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%