A study of the reactions of the following ferrocenyl Schiff bases: (SC)‐(+)‐[FcCH=NCH(R1)CH2OH] {Fc = (η5‐C5H5)Fe(η5‐C5H4), R1 = Me (1a) or CHMe2 (1b)} with cis‐[PtCl2(dmso)2] under different experimental conditions is reported. This study enabled the isolation and characterisation of the enantiomerically pure platinum(II) complexes trans‐(SC)‐[Pt{FcCH=NCH(R1)CH2OH}Cl2(dmso)] {R1 = Me (2a)or CHMe2 (2b)} and cis‐(SC)‐[Pt{FcCH=NCH(R1)CH2OH}Cl2(dmso)] {R1 = Me (3a) or CHMe2 (3b)} as well as four isomeric forms of (SC)‐[Pt{FcCH=N–CH(R1)CH2O}Cl(dmso)] {R1 = Me or CHMe2} (4–7a,b). These isomers differ in the conformation of the imine {anti‐(E) (in 4 and 6) or syn‐(Z) (in 5 and 7)} or in the relative arrangement of the nitrogen and the dmso group {trans (in 4 and 5) or cis (in 6 and 7)}. Imines 1 behave as a N‐donor ligand in 2 and 3 and as a (N,O)– group in 4–7. We also prepared the diastereomers {(Sp,SC) and (Rp,SC)} of the platinacycles [Pt{[(η5‐C5H3)CH=NCH(R1)CH2OH]Fe(η5‐C5H5)}Cl(dmso)] {8 and 9; R1 = Me (Sp,SC) (8a) and (Rp,SC) (9a) or R1 = CHMe2 (Sp,SC) (8b) and (Rp,SC) (9b)}, [Pt{[(η5‐C5H3)CH=NCH(R1)CH2O]Fe(η5‐C5H5)}(dmso)] {10 and 11; R1 = Me (Sp,SC) (10a) and (Rp,SC) (11a) or R1 = CHMe2 (Sp,SC) (10b) and (Rp,SC) (11b)} and [Pt{[(η5‐C5H3)CH=NCH(R1)CH2OH]Fe(η5‐C5H5)}Cl(PPh3)] {12 and 13; R1 = Me (Sp,SC) (12a) and (Rp,SC) (13a) or R1 = CHMe2 (Sp,SC) (12b) and (Rp,SC) (13b)}, containing a [C(sp2,ferrocene),N]– (in 8, 9, 12 and 13) or a [C(sp2,ferrocene),N,O]2– (in 10 and 11) group. The X‐ray crystal structures of 1b·H2O, 3b, 7b·CH2Cl2·1/2H2O and 9a are also reported. Our study allows the elucidation of the factors affecting the preferential formation of a given platinum(II) complex. (© Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 69451 Weinheim, Germany, 2006)