2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c06369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral Molecular Structure Determination for a Desired Compound Just from Its Molecular Formula and Vibrational Optical Activity Spectra

Abstract: A novel proof-of-concept model for chiral molecular structure determination using just the molecular formula and vibrational optical activity (VOA) spectra is presented. To verify this concept, the molecular formula of a desired compound is used to generate all possible chiral structural isomers and their VOA spectra are predicted. The similarity analyses of predicted VOA spectra were then carried out in two different ways: (a) similarity between VOA spectrum of one structural isomer with those of the rest, re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it should be noted that one may claim satisfactory correlation between experimental and predicted ROA/CID spectra by visual perusal of positive/negative features, but quantitative analyses contradict such visual perceptions, as indicated by the similarity overlap values of Sim Raman (0.74), Sim ROA (0.13), and Sim CID (0.32). As stated in previous works, [ 43,44 ] Sim values less than 0.4 do not suggest a good correspondence between experimental and predicted spectra. Although Sim Raman value is greater than 0.4, Raman spectra being monosignate are less discerning than positive and negative peaks containing Sim ROA and Sim CID.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, it should be noted that one may claim satisfactory correlation between experimental and predicted ROA/CID spectra by visual perusal of positive/negative features, but quantitative analyses contradict such visual perceptions, as indicated by the similarity overlap values of Sim Raman (0.74), Sim ROA (0.13), and Sim CID (0.32). As stated in previous works, [ 43,44 ] Sim values less than 0.4 do not suggest a good correspondence between experimental and predicted spectra. Although Sim Raman value is greater than 0.4, Raman spectra being monosignate are less discerning than positive and negative peaks containing Sim ROA and Sim CID.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The magnitudes of Sim ROA and Sim CID values are larger than the minimum recommended value of 0.4. [ 43,44 ] Based on both visual and quantitative comparisons, one can comfortably conclude that the experimental ROA spectra of DATNa in water are satisfactorily reproduced by PCM calculations, in contrast to the earlier noted failure for DAT. This observation supports our assertion stated early on.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The maximum Sim VCD value is +0.548, and the maximum Sim VDF value is +0.588. These values are larger than the recommended reliability threshold of 0.4, 47,48 leading to a confident assignment of (−)‐( R )‐HHC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The maximum SimVCD value is +0.548, and the maximum SimVDF value is +0.588. These values are larger than the recommended reliability threshold of 0.4, 47,48 leading to a confident assignment of (À)-(R)-HHC. The dominant feature in the predicted VCD spectrum is the bisignate feature, negative at 1269 and positive at 1251 cm À1 .…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 71%