“…The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was washed with aqueous NaOH (5 mL, 2 m) and CH 2 Cl 2 (3 Â 20 mL 3, 25.5, 29.3, 46.0, 51.4, 59.0, 60.1, 64.1, 75.8, 80.6, 110.1, 124.7, 127.4, 127.8, 127.97, 128.0, 141.4, 143.8, 174 5, 28.9, 44.5, 52.5, 57.3, 57.4, 80.8, 81.8, 110.7, 124.7, 128.1, 141.6, 174.1. Reduction of the ester according to the given procedure for 2 a afforded ligand 2 c in 67 % yield. [ 3.47 (dd,J 10.8,5.6 Hz,1 H) 4.15 (d,J 5.2 Hz,1 H),4.31 (d,J 5.2 Hz,1 H),7.25 ± 7.60 (m,5 H); 13 C NMR (100 MHz,CDCl 3 ): d 25.4,28.0,41.8,56.0,56.9,64.9,80.9,82.1,110.0,124.7,125.2,127.9,128.1,141.5;MS (EI): m/z (%): 262 (14) [M] , 220 (48), 205 (27), 152 (14), 1124 (21), 105 (100), 80 (55); elemental analysis calcd (%) for C 15 H 19 NO 3 : C 68.94,H 7.33,N 5.36;found C 69.06,H 39,N 5.28.…”