2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.11946
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chiral quantum optics with giant atoms

Ariadna Soro,
Anton Frisk Kockum

Abstract: In quantum optics, it is common to assume that atoms are point-like objects compared to the wavelength of the electromagnetic field they interact with. However, this dipole approximation is not always valid, e.g., if atoms couple to the field at multiple discrete points. Previous work has shown that superconducting qubits coupled to a one-dimensional waveguide can behave as such "giant atoms" and then can interact through the waveguide without decohering, a phenomenon that is not possible with small atoms. Her… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular giant atoms challenge standard approximations and can only be accurately described when taking the finite spatial extent of the artificial atom into account, plus a finite propagation speed if coupled to sound waves [3,4] and counter-rotating terms beyond the rotating-wave approximation (RWA) at strong couplings. Recent work has already capitalized on this and demonstrated several intruiging effects that occur in giant atomic setups, including decoherence-free interactions [5], non-exponential atomic decay [6], oscillating bound states [7] and chiral atom-waveguide couplings [8]. Still theoretical treatment has so far been restricted to couplings in the realm of the RWA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular giant atoms challenge standard approximations and can only be accurately described when taking the finite spatial extent of the artificial atom into account, plus a finite propagation speed if coupled to sound waves [3,4] and counter-rotating terms beyond the rotating-wave approximation (RWA) at strong couplings. Recent work has already capitalized on this and demonstrated several intruiging effects that occur in giant atomic setups, including decoherence-free interactions [5], non-exponential atomic decay [6], oscillating bound states [7] and chiral atom-waveguide couplings [8]. Still theoretical treatment has so far been restricted to couplings in the realm of the RWA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the interaction at each atom-field coupling point can still be well described by the dipole approximation, the atoms in these systems can no longer be viewed as points and the phase accumulations of photons between different coupling points should be taken into account. To date, there have been a variety of intriguing phenomena witnessed in giant-atom structures, such as frequency-dependent Lamb shifts and relaxation rates [8], decoherence-free interatomic interactions [9,[11][12][13][14], unconventional bound states [15][16][17][18][19][20][21], and phase-controlled frequency conversions [22,23]. Most recently, giant atoms have also been extended to the nonperturbative regime [24], to chiral quantum optics [12-15, 25, 26], and to synthetic dimensions [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In SQC platform, the giant atoms, which size are comparable to the wavelength of the coupled photonic mode [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51], can be realized by considering multiple coupling points with a photonic (or phononic) waveguide [52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interference effects between different points will lead to exotic quantum phenomena such as frequency-dependent emission, and dipole-dipole interactions free of decoherence [43,45,51]. Moreover, the fast dark state preparation is also discussed in a chiral quantum system with giant atoms [51]. However, how to realize such chiral quantum networks is rarely discussed currently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%