2001
DOI: 10.1177/095968360101100513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chironomids, temperature and numerical models: a reply to Seppälä

Abstract: Holocene comment and reply 615 provide very strong material for statistical analysis. These two samples represent about one third (6.1-9.0°C) of the full temperature range in the study (from 6.1 to 15.4°C).One odd parameter (DBT = distance beyond tree-line in km) is found in Table 1 (Olander et al., 1999). Lakes 24 and 25 should be 81 and 84 km beyond the tree-line, but there are no large tundra areas in Finland which could be so far from the forest limit. Olander et al. (1999) have also measured the pH valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of transfer functions for reconstructing single environmental variables from biotic proxies (i.e. climate in this instance) has long been a matter of debate (see Korhola et al, 2001 and references therein). It is not enough to simply create transfer functions which have good predictive powers, the real proof is in model validation, for it is well recognised that species almost always respond to several interacting forces which may cascade down the food-web, leading to modelled species-environment relationships being often indirect (see Sayer et al, 2010 for a full discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of transfer functions for reconstructing single environmental variables from biotic proxies (i.e. climate in this instance) has long been a matter of debate (see Korhola et al, 2001 and references therein). It is not enough to simply create transfer functions which have good predictive powers, the real proof is in model validation, for it is well recognised that species almost always respond to several interacting forces which may cascade down the food-web, leading to modelled species-environment relationships being often indirect (see Sayer et al, 2010 for a full discussion).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 1990s, many key papers were published describing and analysing modern calibration training sets that did not include fossil data or environmental reconstructions. Some of these studies caused a lively debate about organism-environment relationships in arctic regions (Olander et al, 1999; Korhola et al, 2001). A need for a similar modern calibration model paper for pollen data was recognised and such a paper was consequently published by Seppä et al (2004).…”
Section: The Helsinki Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies caused a lively debate about organism-environment relationships in arctic regions (Olander et al, 1999;Korhola et al, 2001). A need for a similar modern calibration model paper for pollen data was recognised and such a paper was consequently published by Seppä et al (2004).…”
Section: The Helsinki Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the reconstruction is limited to taxa from a particular fossil group (eg, diatoms, testate amoebae) thought to show strong niche partitioning along the Birks (1995) summarizes the five main assumptions that underpin quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstruction (Table 1). The validity of some of these assumptions has been debated previously (eg, Warner and Hann, 1987;Korhola et al, 2001). In particular, the concepts of 'inertia' and 'threshold' (Smith, 1965;Cole, 1985;Carrión et al, 2001), as well as 'no modern analogue' assemblages (Overpeck et al, 1985;Jackson and Williams, 2004), describe non-linear dynamics and historical contingencies that lead to uncertainty in palaeoenvironmental interpretation and reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%