2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan, a new and environmental benign electrode binder for use with graphite anode in lithium-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 It was concluded that unlike typical graphite or silicon/graphite anodes, low MW and high DS CMC are favorable to LTO electrodes, resulting from high ionic conductivity, low charge-transfer resistance, and good wettability, even though its adhesion is weaker than that of high MW CMC with a low DS. Moreover, a few studies have been conducted on cellulose-like polymers, chemically similar to cellulose, as the binders for other anodes; for example, olivine-structured lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) with lithiated CMC, 8 conventional mesocarbon microbeads with xanthan gum, 9 silicon nanopowder with alginate, 10 silicon/graphite composite with crop-derived polysaccharides such as amylose, amylopectin, and glycogen, 11 graphite anode with chitosan, 12 and silicon anode with carboxymethyl chitosan. In this study, new types of cellulose derivatives but branched polymers, guar gum (GG) and tara gum (TG), were introduced to the binders of LTO electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 It was concluded that unlike typical graphite or silicon/graphite anodes, low MW and high DS CMC are favorable to LTO electrodes, resulting from high ionic conductivity, low charge-transfer resistance, and good wettability, even though its adhesion is weaker than that of high MW CMC with a low DS. Moreover, a few studies have been conducted on cellulose-like polymers, chemically similar to cellulose, as the binders for other anodes; for example, olivine-structured lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO 4 ) with lithiated CMC, 8 conventional mesocarbon microbeads with xanthan gum, 9 silicon nanopowder with alginate, 10 silicon/graphite composite with crop-derived polysaccharides such as amylose, amylopectin, and glycogen, 11 graphite anode with chitosan, 12 and silicon anode with carboxymethyl chitosan. In this study, new types of cellulose derivatives but branched polymers, guar gum (GG) and tara gum (TG), were introduced to the binders of LTO electrodes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease of electrode impedance may be ascribed to two reasons: one is more ion transport and charge-transfer sites created at the electrode and electrolyte interface during the long cycle process; the other is the COS binder is relatively stable with electrochemical cycles which prevent active particles desquamate from copper current collector and provide lasting conductive network for electron transport. For the PVDF-based electrode, the increase of charge-transfer impedance indicates continuous growth of the surface components during the long cycle test [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon deep galvanostatic cycling for 100 cycles, the capacity retention of COS-based electrode is 63.2 % while the capacity retention of PVDF-based electrode is no more than 49.2 % at the same cycling condition. The improved cycling capability and cyclic stability of the electrode by using COS binder illustrates better electrochemical stability of the electrode during electrochemical cycles [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both described mechanisms for capacity loss manifest in various power sources. To eliminate these mechanisms, various additives that increase the polarization of unwanted processes and various binders are used [30,31].…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%