2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2013.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chitosan–DNA complexes: Effect of molecular parameters on the efficiency of delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility to get a fine control of the stability of the complexes by tuning the competition between attractive and repulsive electrostatic interactions justifies the actual enduring attention on polyion-colloid complexation, being key to the technological development of nano-structured materials or nano-devices to be used for example in drug delivery or gene-therapy [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility to get a fine control of the stability of the complexes by tuning the competition between attractive and repulsive electrostatic interactions justifies the actual enduring attention on polyion-colloid complexation, being key to the technological development of nano-structured materials or nano-devices to be used for example in drug delivery or gene-therapy [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These polyplexes were *150 nm in size, and had largely positive f-potential, irrespective of the chitosan molecular weight (Table 2). Overall, as we recently reported (Bordi et al 2014), the chitosan/ pDNA assembly and complex morphology were governed by the N/P ratio, and were instead independent of the chitosan molecular weight and degree of deacetylation (Buschmann et al 2013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The images in Fig. 1 suggested a closely packed structure that might have originated through a compaction process of intermediate complexes (Bordi et al 2014). These polyplexes were *150 nm in size, and had largely positive f-potential, irrespective of the chitosan molecular weight (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations