Chlordiazepoxide-induced reversal of an amphetamine-established aversion: Dipsogenic effects

Riley, Anthony L.; Lovely, Richard H.

doi:10.3758/bf03326754

Cited by 20 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This difference in the rate of acquisition of the aversion and recovery of the aversion suggests a relative insensitivity in the schedule-induced polydipsia design. As described earlier, this insensitivity may reflect an increased tendency to drink following pellet delivery under the schedule-induced polydipsia procedure, a tendency that can override the display of a conditioned taste aversion to a specific solution (see also Grote & Brown, 1973;Riley & Lovely, 1978).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Effects of repeated conditioning trials

Riley

Hyson

Baker

et al. 1980

Animal Learning & Behavior

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In Experiment 1, rats poisoned following schedule-induced saccharin consumption showed a moderate reduction in the schedule-induced consumption of saccharin. With repeated poisoning, schedule-induced saccharin polydipsia was markedly reduced. Acquisition of conditioned aversion under the schedule-induced procedure was significantly slower than acquisition under water deprivation. In addition, recovery of consumption of the previously poisoned solution during extinction was more rapid under schedule-induced polydipsia. Experiment 2 revealed that schedule-induced polydipsia was less sensitive to suppression by conditioned aversions than a prandial drinking condition in which subjects were equally food deprived but were given a mass feeding instead of spaced pellet deliveries, suggesting that the relative insensitivity of schedule-induced polydipsia to conditioned taste aversions is not simply a function of different levels of food deprivation. This relative insensitivity is offered as a partial basis for the occurrence and maintenance of schedule-induced alcohol polydipsia.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Effects of repeated conditioning trials

Riley

Hyson

Baker

et al. 1980

Animal Learning & Behavior

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide have previously been shown to attenuate conditioned taste aversions produced by d-amphetamine (Cappell & LeBlanc, 1973;Concannon & Freda, 1980;Riley & Lovely, 1978). Interestingly, these drugs also increase responding suppressed by the response-dependent (Geller & Seifter, 1960;Goldberg, 1980;Spealman, 1979;Valentine & Barrett, 1981) and response-independent (Miczek, 1973) delivery of a wide variety of stimuli.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

RESPONSE SUPPRESSION BY VISUAL STIMULI PAIRED WITH POSTSESSION d‐AMPHETAMINE INJECTIONS IN THE PIGEON

Glowa

Barrett

1983

J Exper Analysis Behavior

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Responding of pigeons, maintained under a fixed-interval 3-minute schedule of food presentation, was decreased on days that the color of the lights illuminating the food magazine was changed and d-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg, i.m.) was injected after the session. Responding was not decreased by keylight color changes paired with postsession d-amphetamine or by postsession injections of saline. Administration of pentobarbital (3.0 to 5.6 mg/kg), but not d-amphetamine (.3 to 3.0 mg/kg), before the session increased rates of responding suppressed by drug-paired magazine lights. Responding maintained under a fixed-ratio 30-response schedule was not decreased when differently colored magazine lights were paired vith a low (.3 mg/kg) postsession dose of d-amphetamine; with high (3.0 mg/kg) postsession doses, however, responding was completely suppressed after two pairings. The effects of pairing magazine stimuli with an intermediate (1.0 mg/kg) postsession dose of d-amphetamine depended upon the magnitude of prior postsession doses. After being paired with a low dose, stimuli paired with 1.0 mg/kg did not suppress responding. After being paired with a high dose, stimuli paired with 1.0 mg/kg completely suppressed responding. The suppression of food-maintained responding by stimuli paired with postsession drug administration depends upon both behavioral and pharmacological variables.

show abstract

“…It has been suggested that this relative insensitivity of SIP reflects a general tendency to drink and sample the conditioned stimulus following the spaced presentations of food (Riley et aI., 1979). This increased tendency to drink is sufficient to override a conditioned aversion to the previously poisoned solution, as in other procedures that greatly elevate the likelihood of consumption and sampling, for example, extreme deprivation or dipsogenic agents (Grote & Brown, 1973;Riley & Lovely, 1978).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Availability of alternative behaviors

Riley

Peele

Richard

et al. 1981

Animal Learning & Behavior

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Animals poisoned following exposure to saccharin subsequently avoided the schedule-induced consumption of saccharin. While this suppression was transient for subjects who had access only to the saccharin solution during the free-food presentations, recovery of schedule-induced saccharin consumption was significantly retarded for subjects who had concurrent access to saccharin and a running wheel. It has been suggested that the transient suppression of scheduleinduced polydipsia by conditioned taste aversions results from the pellet-induced tendency to drink within the schedule-induced polydipsia procedure. That access to the running wheel reduces schedule-induced polydipsia in general and prolongs the suppression of schedule-induced polydipsia by taste aversions supports this view.

show abstract

Chlordiazepoxide-induced reversal of an amphetamine-established aversion: Dipsogenic effects

Cited by 20 publications

References 22 publications

The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Effects of repeated conditioning trials

The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Effects of repeated conditioning trials

RESPONSE SUPPRESSION BY VISUAL STIMULI PAIRED WITH POSTSESSION d‐AMPHETAMINE INJECTIONS IN THE PIGEON

The interaction of conditioned taste aversions and schedule-induced polydipsia: Availability of alternative behaviors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About