2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgar.2015.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorhexidine and mupirocin susceptibilities in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bacteraemia and nasal colonisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…chlorhexidine) seems to be reasonable, but remains controversial. 15,16,20,21,45 In contrast with previous findings, showing a two-to four-fold increase in chlorhexidine MBC of five tested qacA + ST239-TW skin isolates, 13 no conclusion could be drawn from our ST239-TW BSI isolates, since all strains…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…chlorhexidine) seems to be reasonable, but remains controversial. 15,16,20,21,45 In contrast with previous findings, showing a two-to four-fold increase in chlorhexidine MBC of five tested qacA + ST239-TW skin isolates, 13 no conclusion could be drawn from our ST239-TW BSI isolates, since all strains…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread use of biocides for decolonization has become an important infection control intervention to decrease transmission of nosocomial pathogens, but has also raised concerns about the development of bacterial biocide tolerance. 13,16,44,45 Here we show evidence that bacterial uptake into skin cells together with extracellular adherence can protect some MRSA clones against biocide action. This provides a putative mechanism whereby ST239-TW was able to resist chlorhexidine when introduced on the ICU of GSTT, in the absence of a measurable difference in MIC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Although the low rate of MUP-and CHX-resistant isolates found in our hospital, we observed that the resistance to MUP raised from 0.67% (1/148) to 4.4% (3/68) in 10 years, in our MRSA isolates. These rates are still low in comparison with the study by Munoz-Gallego et al 22 , who described a resistance to MUP around 15% in blood and nasal isolates, in samples collected between 2012/2014, in Madrid, Spain. In contrast, Brazilian data 23 reported low rates (1.1%) of MUP-resistant MRSA, in children with atopic dermatitis in Porto Alegre, Brazil, similar to our findings, and a higher rate described by Moura et al 24 who presented a MUP-resistant MRSA rate of 72% in samples from nurses' saliva.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 69%
“…As S. aureus infection is often endogenous (10,11), our study suggests that antimicrobial and antiseptic resistance gene profiles of the original colonizing isolate may inform stewardship and guide systemic prophylaxis and/or antimicrobial therapy. While MDR/mupirocin resistance association has been reported in isolates causing infection (including bloodstream infection) (12)(13)(14), our investigation revealed several MDR genes in addition to ileS2 and/or qacA among MR-MRSA colonizing isolates. Furthermore, cocarriage of antimicrobial/ antiseptic resistance genes was more frequent among isolates from patients with persistent colonization (data not presented here).…”
mentioning
confidence: 48%