1980
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1980.01020040125020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorhexidine Effects on Corneal Epithelium and Endothelium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
30
0
1

Year Published

1983
1983
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chlorhexidine, however, has excellent germicidal properties (12,13,(16)(17)(18)21) with persistent effect (16,17,21) and has been successfully used in contact lens solutions. Toxicological studies have shown that chlorhexidine is safe as a contact lens disinfectant (2,10), and direct topical application of concentrations of up to 2% causes neither visible nor light microscopic corneal changes (9,15), although superficial epithelial changes are noted by electron microscopy (4,6). We have investigated the efficacy of various concentrations of aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate in experimental models to study its use as a potential preoperative antiseptic agent for the eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…Chlorhexidine, however, has excellent germicidal properties (12,13,(16)(17)(18)21) with persistent effect (16,17,21) and has been successfully used in contact lens solutions. Toxicological studies have shown that chlorhexidine is safe as a contact lens disinfectant (2,10), and direct topical application of concentrations of up to 2% causes neither visible nor light microscopic corneal changes (9,15), although superficial epithelial changes are noted by electron microscopy (4,6). We have investigated the efficacy of various concentrations of aqueous chlorhexidine gluconate in experimental models to study its use as a potential preoperative antiseptic agent for the eye.…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…As an example, the periorbi tal use of a detergent containing 4% chlorhexidine in duced irreparable damage to the cornea of an anaesthe tised patient [ 18]. The application of a chlorhexidine solu tion >0.05% to the eye is contraindicated, since swelling of the stroma was demonstrated to be due to the use of a 0.05% solution of chlorhexidine gluconate [19]. When a 0.1 % solution is applied, the outcome is a loss of the sur face layers of the corneal epithelium and the microvilli of the second layer [20]; the conjunctival reaction sets in with a solution stronger than 0.005-0.05% [21].…”
Section: Periorbital Antisepsissupporting
confidence: 39%
“…This differs from corneas that are bathed on their anterior surfaces with silicone oil where low swelling rates of about 3-5 pm/h occur [10,12], The stability of the control tissue swelling rate, however, indi cates that the cornea is behaving in the same manner over the experimental time period, but that even Na+/K+ BTS cannot serve to maintain constant corneal thickness. Switch ing the epithelial bathing solution to a K+-free solution, with all other conditions remaining constant, caused the cornea to undergo a greater degree of initial swelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…as measured on a Precision uOsmette osmometer. Per fusion of the epithelium was at 2 ml/min with with drawal of the solution by vacuum [12], Iso-osmotic substitution of KCI was made with NaCl (K+-free BTS). and the solution had an osmolarity of 302 mosm at pH 7.4.…”
Section: Aterials and M Eth O D Smentioning
confidence: 42%