1980
DOI: 10.1038/287714a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloride ions in aqueous solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
65
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
7
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental coordination number for chloride is 6. 51 There is small correlation between the coordination number and the ion diffusion constant [ Fig. 7(a)].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental coordination number for chloride is 6. 51 There is small correlation between the coordination number and the ion diffusion constant [ Fig. 7(a)].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking 0-06 A as an acceptable uncertainty value, we see that this is not always sufficient to say that the present results are consistent with the ones obtained by neutron diffraction. Examining possible reasons for such a discrepancy, Cummings, Enderby, Neilson, Newsome, Howe, Howells & Soper (1980) think that it could be 'a consequence of the inherently poor discrimination of total X-ray patterns from solutions and the need to analyse the data in terms of a rather simple model'. While it is true that neutron diffraction, through the technique of isotopic substitution, permits some cases to deal brilliantly with the problem of resolution in polyatomic systems, it is also true that such an argument, critically examined, does not hold in explaining the differences from X-ray diffraction results.…”
Section: Mean Distances R(a) and Root-mean-square Deviations Cy(a) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 position of the first maximum (r max ) and minimum (r min ) of the Cl−O and Cl−D pair correlation functions and the corresponding coordination numbers are reported in Table I, together with experimental values. The latter ones differ depending on the technique used (i.e., neutron diffraction or X-ray measurements) and the type of counterions present in the solution, 5,6,[36][37][38][39][40][41] whose effect however appears to be minor. The dependence of experimental data on concentration is instead more pronounced (at least for the Cl−D coordination).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%