“…For example, Jarsjö et al (2007) specifically investigated the effect of local random variability around the advective travel times for the Forsmark catchment area, confirming that in this specific catchment case also, the effect of such local variability within mobile water is small on the expected largescale solute transport (Jarsjö et al, 2007). Numerous coupled advection-sorption and/or advection-reaction modelling studies based on advective travel time quantification approaches have also shown that and how a first-step quantification of advective solute travel time distributions can readily be coupled with relevant process models of diffusive mass transfer (Cvetkovic and Shapiro, 1990;Destouni and Cvetkovic, 1991;Cvetkovic and Dagan, 1994;Destouni et al, 1994;Destouni and Graham, 1995;Cvetkovic and Haggerty, 2002;, as well as with biogeochemical reaction process models of various degrees of complexity (Destouni and Cvetkovic, 1991;Ginn et al, 1995;Simmons et al, 1995;Berglund and Cvetkovic, 1996;Cvetkovic and Dagan, 1996;Eriksson and Destouni, 1997;Yabusaki et al, 1998;Tompson et al, 2002;Malmström et al, 2004Malmström et al, , 2008Botter et al, 2005). Furthermore, the present neglect of the travel time contributions of the transport through the unsaturated zone, from the soil surface to the groundwater zone, can readily be relaxed by the subsystem convolution methodology proposed and used by Destouni and Graham (1995) and Foussereau et al (2001).…”