2017
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2017.00122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chloride:Sodium Ratio May Accurately Predict Corrected Chloride Disorders and the Presence of Unmeasured Anions in Dogs and Cats

Abstract: Disorders of chloride and mixed acid–base disturbances are common in veterinary emergency medicine. Rapid identification of these alterations and the presence of unmeasured anions aid prompt patient assessment and management. This study aimed to determine in dogs and cats if site-specific reference values for [Cl−]:[Na+] ratio and [Na+] − [Cl−] difference accurately identify corrected chloride abnormalities and to evaluate the predictive ability of the [Cl−]:[Na+] ratio for the identification of unmeasured ani… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the Cl À /Na þ ratio were consistent with those reported by Goggs et al (2017) in all the cats, although they were significantly higher in groups II, III and IV compared to the values found in groups C and I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the Cl À /Na þ ratio were consistent with those reported by Goggs et al (2017) in all the cats, although they were significantly higher in groups II, III and IV compared to the values found in groups C and I.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the values of the Cl À /Na þ ratio remained within the range provided by Goggs et al (2017) in all the groups (0.74-0.80), including group IV diagnosed with metabolic acidosis based on the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation (HH equation). Based on this study, the upper reference range of the Cl À /Na þ ratio in cats with suspected CKD should approximate 0.77-0.78.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations