2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmt.2022.101528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorine in NiO promotes electroreduction of CO2 to formate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The TOF is separately calculated as 7.84 s −1 (i cat /i p = 6.3) in CO 2 -saturated 0.1 M n Bu 4 NPF 6 /DMF solution with 0.0175 M CH 3 COOH at −1.99 V, which is comparable to those reported nickel-based homogeneous catalysts (Table S4) [76][77][78][79][80][81]. However, due to the process being controlled by diffusion, for most molecular catalysts, the product of the electrocatalytic CO 2 is carbon monoxide, which is very different from other heterogeneous catalysts for producing formic acid and formate with Ni-based anodes [82][83][84][85]. Then, the rinse test was conducted on the FTO glass electrode after electrocatalysis, and no obvious current density was observed, which was similar to the blank solution before catalysis (navy blue line), ensuring that complex 1 is a stable homogeneous catalyst.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Co 2 Reductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The TOF is separately calculated as 7.84 s −1 (i cat /i p = 6.3) in CO 2 -saturated 0.1 M n Bu 4 NPF 6 /DMF solution with 0.0175 M CH 3 COOH at −1.99 V, which is comparable to those reported nickel-based homogeneous catalysts (Table S4) [76][77][78][79][80][81]. However, due to the process being controlled by diffusion, for most molecular catalysts, the product of the electrocatalytic CO 2 is carbon monoxide, which is very different from other heterogeneous catalysts for producing formic acid and formate with Ni-based anodes [82][83][84][85]. Then, the rinse test was conducted on the FTO glass electrode after electrocatalysis, and no obvious current density was observed, which was similar to the blank solution before catalysis (navy blue line), ensuring that complex 1 is a stable homogeneous catalyst.…”
Section: Electrocatalytic Co 2 Reductionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This may result from the improved accessibility between In sites and CO 2 as demonstrated above. Moreover, the CO 2 RR performances of as-designed In 1 /NC-3D outperform most of the recently reported catalysts (Figure g and Table S2) in terms of high FE formate at a large current density. ,,, Such a strategy of constructing 3D porous In SACs is demonstrated to attain high formate selectivity at high current density, circumventing the present limitation of In-based SACs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…It is important to note that, in this analysis, we did not include the effect of pH since the study primarily focuses on ORR reaction mechanisms. The pH effect can be analyzed through surface Pourbaix diagrams obtained from the thermodynamically stable hydrogenation steps . Such analysis is beyond the scope of this work.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH effect can be analyzed through surface Pourbaix diagrams obtained from the thermodynamically stable hydrogenation steps. 40 Such analysis is beyond the scope of this work. However, this aspect may be an avenue for future investigations to comprehensively understand the role of pH in these reactions.…”
Section: Oxygen Reduction Reaction Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%