2010
DOI: 10.1039/c0dt00895h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chlorometallate(iii) ionic liquids as Lewis acidic catalysts – a quantitative study of acceptor properties

Abstract: The Gutmann Acceptor Number (AN), which is a quantitative measure of Lewis acidity, has been estimated using the (31)P NMR chemical shift of a probe molecule, triethylphosphine oxide, for a range of chlorometallate(III) ionic liquids, based on Group 13 metals (aluminium(III), gallium(III) and indium(III)) and the 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium cation, at different compositions. The results were interpreted in terms of extant speciation studies of chlorometallate(III) ionic liquids, and compared with a range of st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

6
134
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
134
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental discrepancy between our ANs and the hydrogen-bond-donation ability, either expressed by the Kamlet-Taft-α value or by the HBD value, could originate from the completely different probe molecules and measurement techniques used for the determination of the ANs, α-and HBD-values. Seddon et al 43 already stated, "it must be remembered that a Lewis acidity scale can never be universal, and will depend on, inter alia, the nature of the probe molecule". Therefore, a detailed comparison requires a much larger set of data, most suitably also for ILs with different cations, to obtain a better view of the overall picture and closer insight into the cation dependence of the AN and α, and also the DN and β.…”
Section: Donor and Acceptor Numbers For Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental discrepancy between our ANs and the hydrogen-bond-donation ability, either expressed by the Kamlet-Taft-α value or by the HBD value, could originate from the completely different probe molecules and measurement techniques used for the determination of the ANs, α-and HBD-values. Seddon et al 43 already stated, "it must be remembered that a Lewis acidity scale can never be universal, and will depend on, inter alia, the nature of the probe molecule". Therefore, a detailed comparison requires a much larger set of data, most suitably also for ILs with different cations, to obtain a better view of the overall picture and closer insight into the cation dependence of the AN and α, and also the DN and β.…”
Section: Donor and Acceptor Numbers For Ionic Liquidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16,17] Borenium ionic liquids were prepared via a solventless procedure, analogous to that used for chlorometallate ionic liquids. [18] [19,20] In contrast, higher chlorogallate(III) anion homologues are known, [20,21] so gallium(III) chloride was used in 1-3 mol ratio.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is well established in Lewis acidity studies of both borenium cations [7,22] and of ionic liquids. [18,20] Unambiguous results could only be obtained for systems with N-donors, because the 31 P NMR signals from tepo (used in 1-3% quantity) were obscured by signals from the P888 ligand. AN values were calculated based on the signal originating from [BCl2L(tepo)] + (Table 2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The anionic composition determines the properties of chlorometallates which again depend on the types of metal chloride and the ratios of metal chloride to parent organic chloride. [3][4][5] The various developments of such ionic salts over the last two decades have recognized these chlorometallates/halometallates as functional materials with unique and useful properties including photophysical, magnetic, catalytic and semiconducting properties [6][7][8] The catalytic performances of these chlorometallates were examined for the three-component synthesis of novel 14-aryl-7-(N-phenyl)-14H-dibenzo[a,j]acridine derivatives (1) from the reaction of an equimolar mixture of 2-naphthol, N-phenyl-2-naphthylamine and aromatic aldehyde under solvent-free conditions at 100°C. The benzoacridine derivatives have a wide range of pharmacological activities such as antitumour, antiviral, antimicrobial, antimalarial, analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%