1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0750-7658(84)80146-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choc anaphylactoïde mortel chez un malade traité par bêta-bloquants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study provides information that pertains to the additional two questions regarding -blocker risk: are severe reactions more frequent, and are they more likely to be refractory to management? These data imply that patients receiving -blockers are at elevated risk for both, and are consistent with previous reports of unusually severe anaphylaxis occurring in patients receiving -blockers [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Case-control Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study provides information that pertains to the additional two questions regarding -blocker risk: are severe reactions more frequent, and are they more likely to be refractory to management? These data imply that patients receiving -blockers are at elevated risk for both, and are consistent with previous reports of unusually severe anaphylaxis occurring in patients receiving -blockers [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Case-control Studysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Newman and Schultz [17] reported a similar case. Additional cases of unusually severe anaphylaxis in patients receiving -blockers have also been described [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In 1986, two fatal anaphylactic reactions to penicillin were reported.…”
Section: Clinical Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretical and clinical evidence for a risk of severe and difficult to treat allergic reactions favored by the use of BB during IT is certainly strong. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][28][29][30][31] However, when confronted with a patient with a history of severe allergic sting reactions who is on BB, we have to estimate the risk of giving the BB during VIT against the risk of stopping the BB in the presence of cardiovascular disease or even the risk of renouncing VIT and continuing the BB. The significantly prolonged survival of patients with CHD or cardiac failure under BB treatment, 13-15 the high frequency of deaths caused by cardiovascular disease-in Switzerland every year, more than 25,000 compared, with an average of 3 caused by Hymenoptera sting anaphylaxis 36 -and the exposure of the patient to further stings and the nature of the cardiovascular disease must be considered in this situation, preferably together with the family practitioner and a cardiologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports of severe, difficult-to-treat, or even fatal anaphylaxis in patients on b-blocker (BB) treatment [1][2][3][4][5][6] have raised concern about the use of these medications in patients with a history of anaphylaxis. 7,8 Similar observations of severe and difficult-to-treat allergic side effects have been published in patients on specific allergen immunotherapy (SIT) and concurrent b-blockade.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%