Choice of All‐Ceramic Systems

Ahmad, Irfan

doi:10.1002/9780470759363.ch3

Protocols for Predictable Aesthetic Dental Restorations 2006

DOI: 10.1002/9780470759363.ch3

|View full text |Cite

Choice of All‐Ceramic Systems

Irfan Ahmad¹

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Crowns Fabricated by Three All Ceramic CAD-CAM Systems Using Their Respective Scanners - An in vitro study

Ram¹,

Agarwal²

2012

Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim:To evaluate and compare the marginal fi t of crowns fabricated by three All Ceramic CAD-CAM systems using their respective scanners.Objectives:1.To evaluate the marginal fi t of All Ceramic crowns fabricated using Contact scanner-Procera system. 2. To evaluate the marginal fi t of All Ceramic crowns fabricated using Optical scanner-Lava system. 3.To evaluate the marginal fi t of All Ceramic crowns fabricated using Laser scanner-Cercon system . 4.To compare the marginal fi t of crowns fabricated by three All Ceramic CAD-CAM systems using their respective scanner-Contact scanner, Optical scanner and Laser scanner. Materials and Methods:5 crowns fabricated with Contact scanner-Procera system (Group I), 5 crowns fabricated with Optical scanner-Lava system (Group II), 5 crowns fabricated with Laser scanner-Cercon system(Group III). The marginal fi t would be evaluated at two stages for each group:A-Pre-veneering stage (coping) B-Post-veneering stage (crown). Results: The mean value of marginal gap with Group IA was 27.48 +2.63 and IB was 26.13+ 0.85 and that of Group IIA was 23.27 + 0.99 and IIB 19.22 + 0.88. The mean value of marginal gap of Group IIIA was 32.80 + 2.46 and IIIB was 28.77 + 1.94. Conclusion: The marginal gap was maximum with Group III and minimum with group II amongst the three used systems. The mean marginal gap values of subgroup B were less than subgroup A.

show abstract

A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Crowns Fabricated by Three All Ceramic CAD-CAM Systems Using Their Respective Scanners - An in vitro study

Ram¹,

Agarwal²

2012

Journal of Contemporary Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Choice of All‐Ceramic Systems

Cited by 1 publication

References 36 publications

A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Crowns Fabricated by Three All Ceramic CAD-CAM Systems Using Their Respective Scanners - An in vitro study

A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Fit of Crowns Fabricated by Three All Ceramic CAD-CAM Systems Using Their Respective Scanners - An in vitro study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About