2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2015.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of experimental venue matters in ecotoxicology studies: Comparison of a laboratory-based and an outdoor mesocosm experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
21
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
3
21
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Johnson et al employed a study design in which all tadpoles experienced intraspecific competition; this additional stressor could have caused temperature variability to interact with chlorothalonil and drive substantial lethal effects. Mikó et al compared the toxicity of glyphosate to Rana dalmatina tadpoles between laboratory and ambient environments in mesocosms in which tadpoles experienced interspecific competition; they determined that ambient conditions reduce toxicity relative to laboratory environments. Because tadpoles in our study did not experience interspecific competition, we would not have detected interactions between temperature and competition, although such study designs may more closely approximate realistic ecological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Johnson et al employed a study design in which all tadpoles experienced intraspecific competition; this additional stressor could have caused temperature variability to interact with chlorothalonil and drive substantial lethal effects. Mikó et al compared the toxicity of glyphosate to Rana dalmatina tadpoles between laboratory and ambient environments in mesocosms in which tadpoles experienced interspecific competition; they determined that ambient conditions reduce toxicity relative to laboratory environments. Because tadpoles in our study did not experience interspecific competition, we would not have detected interactions between temperature and competition, although such study designs may more closely approximate realistic ecological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher temperatures increase the lethality of carbaryl to amphibians . Johnson et al and Mikó et al compared toxicology trials from standard laboratory climate and ambient climate conditions, and Johnson et al found higher toxicity of chlorothalonil to tadpoles in ambient environments, although Miko et al found higher toxicity of glyphosate in laboratory environments. However, neither Johnson et al nor Mikó et al experimentally controlled thermal regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the complexity in the natural environment is not fully reflected in the relatively small volume of water used in laboratory experiments, and the time scales used are usually short. For example, Miko et al (2015) compared results from ecotoxity tests on tadpoles in the lab and in outdoor mesocos which showed strikingly different results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, similar studies comparing the effects of pesticides on different test sites are scarce (Mikó et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Arenzon (2011), to carry out ecotoxicological tests, even standardized ones, there is always a concern to reproduce the effects on the field into the laboratory, and it can be done by new approaches, as in situ tests but also with the use of native species that are more representative of the study sites. Mikó et al (2015) investigated the importance of the experimental site for ecotoxicological studies and demonstrated considerable discrepancies between classic laboratory test results and mesocosms experiments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%