1973
DOI: 10.1016/0020-708x(73)90103-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of physical parameters in charged particle induced X-ray fluorescence analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vacuum target chamber and X-ray detection system used here are displayed schematically in Figure 3. These have been described in detail earlier (9,17), and current discussion will be kept to a minimum. The proton beam incident on the specimen is defined by three graphite collimators designed to minimize scattering.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The vacuum target chamber and X-ray detection system used here are displayed schematically in Figure 3. These have been described in detail earlier (9,17), and current discussion will be kept to a minimum. The proton beam incident on the specimen is defined by three graphite collimators designed to minimize scattering.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With "good" carbon foils, the characteristic X-ray background from trace metal impurities can be very low. This can be quantified by comparing spectra presented by Herman et al (9) from a blank foil and one with a drop of lake water evaporated on it. The foil contributed about 5 of the observed 170 ppb of Fe and 3 of the observed 32 ppb of Zn.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…899 Cation exchange was used to separate interfering ions prior to determination in a fluorimeter. The detection limit was 0.06 μg L −1 , and the precision was ±6% at a total zinc concentration of 0.28 μg L −1 .…”
Section: Flow-injection Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass detection limit of P I X E has been discussed in detail by Herman et al (1973). It can be defined as the minimum mass of target material which produces a signal to background ratio better than a certain constant (30% in this work).…”
Section: Atomic Numbermentioning
confidence: 99%