Choice of suitable Identity and Access Management standards for mobile computing and communication

Naik, Nitin; Jenkins, Paul; Newell, David

doi:10.1109/ict.2017.7998280

Cited by 15 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…It provides various ways to exchange route messages: directly, in fanout form, by topic, and based on headers [3]. For enhancing the security of IoT systems across multiple clouds, these messaging protocols can be combined with identity and access management protocols [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29]. Similarly, for the better provisioning of IoT systems, the Docker-based design may be an alternative option for users [30], [31], [32].…”

Section: Reliability/qos Vs Interoperabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP

Naik

2017

2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)

Self Cite

489

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The standard and real-time communication technology is an unalloyed inevitability for the development of Internet of Things (IoT) applications. However, the selection of a standard and effective messaging protocol is a challenging and daunting task for any organisation because it depends on the nature of the IoT system and its messaging requirements. Copious messaging protocols have been developed and employed by various organisations based on their requirements in the last two decades. Though, none of them is able to support all messaging requirements of all types of IoT systems. Messaging protocol is an ongoing dilemma for the IoT industry; consequently, it is important to understand the pros and cons of the widely accepted and emerging messaging protocols for IoT systems to determine their best-fit scenarios. Therefore, this paper presents an evaluation of the four established messaging protocols MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP for IoT systems. Firstly, it presents the broad comparison among these messaging protocols to introduce their characteristics comparatively. Afterwards, it performs a further in-depth and relative analysis based on some interrelated criteria to gain insight into their strengths and limitations. Thus, based on this detailed evaluation, the user can decide their appropriate usage in various IoT systems according to their requirements and suitability.

show abstract

Section: Reliability/qos Vs Interoperabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP

Naik

2017

2017 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE)

Self Cite

489

212

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…OAuth was found to be suitable for an authorization only but not for an authentication while OpenID Connect was found to be the best choice [9]. Brent Carrara et.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 98%

Integrated Framework for Anonymous Biometric Key Based Identity Management System

Suresh*¹,

Radhika²

2019

IJRTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Implementation of measures to ensure security of transactions while ensuring privacy of user credentials is an area of challenge in digital transactions over a network. Integration of biometric pattern matching into an identity management system (IMS) enhances security of transactions and improves ease of use. Privacy of users in a biometric based system is improved by using keys generated directly from feature sets instead of conventional stored templates. This paper proposes a framework for integrating biometric key based authentication into an IMS.The generated keys need to be long, reproducible with high integrity and need to possess sufficient entropy. Generation of keys directly from feature traits poses a challenge due to intra and inter user variations inherent to biometric data. A novel methodology for generating and integrating crytpo keys into an identity management system is proposed. The keys have been extracted from iris trait. 300 bits keys have been extracted from iris datasets. The results are promising and can be extended to multi-modal biometric feature sets.

show abstract

“…This federated IDM model solves two major issues: 1) it removes the organisational burden of managing identity and credentials securely by introducing a third-party IDentity Provider (IDP), which is an additional task alongside the main business operations and 2) it removes the burden from users to manage several identity related credentials for several systems by offering a Single-Sign On (SSO) facility [8], [9]. However, this IDM model has a similar issue in that the abundance of identity related personally identifiable information of a user is held by the IDP (see Fig.…”

Section: Federated Identity Management Model (Idm 20)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Governing Principles of Self-Sovereign Identity Applied to Blockchain Enabled Privacy Preserving Identity Management Systems

Naik

Jenkins

2020

2020 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE)

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Choice of suitable Identity and Access Management standards for mobile computing and communication

Abstract: Abstract-Enterprises

Cited by 15 publications

References 12 publications

Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP

Choice of effective messaging protocols for IoT systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP

Integrated Framework for Anonymous Biometric Key Based Identity Management System

Governing Principles of Self-Sovereign Identity Applied to Blockchain Enabled Privacy Preserving Identity Management Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About